FreeBSD Screen Shots

XFCE panels can most certainly be (made) transparent.

2vc7w5l.png
 
Here's my current setup:



Custom wallpaper. It's a simple gradient fill with the FreeBSD logo superimposed.
Window manager is x11-wm/musca.

I'm currently working on updating the x11/fbpanel port to 6.1. That's it running at the top of the screen. Menu and launchbar on the left, taskbar buttons in the middle, the tray and various monitors & plugins (network, memory, cpu, battery, volume, tclock) on the right. I usually don't like to have those monitors cluttering up the screen and typically have only the volume and tclock to the right of the tray. But as I said, I'm currently working on the port and therefore have everything going.

Beastie start button courtesy of eponasoft.



Musca supports both tiled and overlapped window arrangements.
Here you see two instances of x11/roxterm and deskutils/osmo in overlapped or "stacked" mode. That's audio/mcplay running in the foremost roxterm.



Here's a tiled desktop. Osmo again, and mcplay in the lefthand pane. At the lower right is pyradio, which is not yet in ports.

In both tiled and overlapped mode, a red border indicates the active pane.

As you can see, I like lighter colors. Also, since my eyesight isn't as good as it once was, a fairly large black font against a light background. I find it easier to discriminate between the letter shapes that way, while light text on a dark background often takes more effort to read. (I've been meaning to hack pyradio to change its color scheme.)
 
OpenBSD is just great!!! I always love it. Just have no so much packages. When I wanted to move to BSD, OpenBSD was my first thought but I wanted a desktop computer and FreeBSD is more for Desktop and do not come with DE :D. OpenBSD also can be a destop but is more for servers / firewalls etc.
 
The exact same goes for FreeBSD. The fact that there are more options to build WMs/DEs on FreeBSD doesn't take away from the fact that it's primarily a server operating system. FreeBSD 'can also be a desktop', yes, but that's about it. FreeBSD is not 'more for desktop' -- there's more desktop software ported to FreeBSD. But that's a very different thing.
 
The exact same goes for FreeBSD. The fact that there are more options to build WMs/DEs on FreeBSD doesn't take away from the fact that it's primarily a server operating system. FreeBSD 'can also be a desktop', yes, but that's about it. FreeBSD is not 'more for desktop' --there's more desktop software ported to FreeBSD. But that's a very different thing.

Well I agree. That I was trying to say with my words :P
 
Back
Top