What made you chose OpenBSD on your laptop. That seems so inefficient. If you are using Hardened just stick with it.
Using a multiple OSs always affects your fluency and productivity just like speaking multiple natural languages (I speak 3 on daily basis) makes you essentially non-fluent in any of them.I just wanted to learn OpenBSD. Why do you think it's unefficient? I remember you being kind of OpenBSD fanboy
I run 3 routers for my own use (APU2 and 2x Edgerouter Lites). I wanted to run *BSD on it and FreeBSD with its old pf makes it not a good choice for me. Also, mips64 is tier 3 on FreeBSD, I wouldn't want my router to run basically untested and potentially unstable software, while it's perfectly stable with OpenBSD. Choosing the OS for APU2 was simple because I already had configs for OpenBSD
I wouldn't consider WindowMaker dead. Last release was in August 2015 and there were several commits in 2016 (see http://repo.or.cz/wmaker-crm.git/shortlog/refs/heads/next). Clearly someone out there cares for it.
It is quickly becoming my "go to" wm because frankly, it just works. It is odd getting used to a tiling wm when you've been using a stacking wm for nearly 2 decades, but the only "hard" part is typing out the first 3 or so characters of an apps name in x11/dmenu. I even successfully customized and am running "dwmstatus". I deserve another beer for that 
#!/bin/sh
# dmenu requires a list of newline separated items as input.
# This items are listed at the top of the screen.
# The selected item is outputted to stdout.
# Here it is stored in the variable selection.
# In case of the result different programs are launched.
options="Mutt_Slrn"
selection=`echo $options|tr "_" "\n"|dmenu`
case $selection in
"Mutt") st -e mutt -y & ;;
"Slrn") /usr/home/chris/scripts/slrn.sh & ;;
esac-static const char *dmenucmd[] = { "dmenu_run", "-m", dmenumon, "-fn", dmenufont, "-nb", normbgcolor, "-nf", normfgcolor, "-sb", selbgcolor, "-sf", selfgcolor, NULL };
+static const char *dmenucmd[] = { "/usr/home/chris/scripts/dmenu_wrap.sh", "-m", dmenumon, "-fn", dmenufont, "-nb", normbgcolor, "-nf", normfgcolor, "-sb", selbgcolor, "-sf", selfgcolor, NULL };I was on the lists until recently and WM is alive indeed! Of course, it sees far less activity than many other, younger and more fashionable WMs, but bugs do get fixed, features do get implemented. There's also an ongoing effort to rebuild a curated collection of dockapps at http://www.dockapps.net and if you have a dockapp that isn't there yet, please let them know (I did just that with wmmp, which I fixed and kept in a GitHub repository for years, and they added it to the collection in a matter of minutes).
I loved the hell out of Windowmaker. Its just cool. It hearkened back to the days of NeXTSTEP for me. Then once I got a taste of all of that oldschool boxy simple goodness, I wanted more. So I did NeXTSTEP+GNUstep complete with the "recycler" and everything. But for me everything kept crashing and just wasn't ready for primetime. Now I am on fbsd11 with dtwm/cde.
