But it's not only about discussing. In my idea there is the chance to bring some hardwares from home and place them on the room,for testing and experimenting. Discussing only it's annoying after some time. To play with some hardware is important to learn and to tinker.
EuroBSDCon is in a different city/country each year.The sign that even in a big city like Milan,there isn't a great excitement for FreeBSD.
EuroBSDCon is in a different city/country each year.
That applies to any country out there based on statistics and hosting BSDCon isn't going to change anything.It is a very Windows-centric country,stubborn to change and experiment new tools and tecniques,generally speaking.
"The first rule of FUG is that you do not talk about FUG, the second rule of FUG is that you do not talk about FUG..."I would have a problem with the name "FUG". Imagine you put on your coat, your spouse asks if you are going out and you respond "Yes dear, I am going to a FUG meeting". There is a high chance of drama coming your way, don't you think?
Other than that, it sounds like a good idea.
Links, please.Actually wasn't Italy the one to overrule Microsoft's forcing of the OEMs to have Windows installations on all laptops? They (MS) were claiming hardware is useless without OS therefore it's ok to have Windows preinstalled and charged. Could be 15 years ago.
I'd say, prioritize reliability of those solutions over everything else. Then everything else will fall in place. ? My personal take: It's OK if the solutions are Windows-based, it's more important to pay attention to delivering results. People should be the ones paying attention to the job, pull their own weight, and make sure results check as many checkboxes as practical.Companies are even scared to roll out Linux solutions due to lack of experts on the local job market, FreeBSD is a total unknown.
Links, please.
I am. If Italy was in fact in court trying to overrule Microsoft over claims that MS forces OEMs to preinstall Windows - that should be recorded somewhere.Are you really asking me for links for some event I've read about 15 years ago?
"Punish OEMs" ?And no, Microsoft claimed what they claimed so they could punish OEMs that don't charge for a mandatory windows installation on the laptop, but put FreeDOS on it and let the user install what they want.
Most Windows-compatible consumer-grade hardware (even nice stuff like gaming laptops) comes with Windows Home edition, which is kinda useless anyway. Microsoft makes its money on Pro and Enterprise editions. That's where the money is, anyway.If you buy Windows laptop and wipe that Windows clean you paid MS free money.
That was a loophole MS had to provide or be slammed with antitrust suits. The OEMs had to provide a MS compatible system. They shipped FreeDOS. Forcing them to a MS only system would likely have summoned the banhammer even back then.And no, Microsoft claimed what they claimed so they could punish OEMs that don't charge for a mandatory windows installation on the laptop, but put FreeDOS on it and let the user install what they want.
Links, please.
I'd also argue that Microsoft's claim does have merit to it. The vast majority of people who try to use a computer - they would probably try to do without if this "Using a computer" idea necessarily meant learning how to install an OS on it. Those of us who know how to install stuff like FreeBSD or Linux on it - we don't care if Windows is preinstalled or not. We'll just wipe the disk, dual-boot, virtualize, and spend time on it, because it's fun. Most people expect stuff like gaming keyboards with backlights to work out of the box, anyway.
oh? ? ?Piracy depends on where you are. The high GDP countries don't have much piracy.