It wasn't a staff's decision, it just came with another XenForo update. Nobody here thought so deep to invent those reactions.I actually think it's a bit of a bold move to allow us to also apply negative feedback. I pick that up as a signal that the staff takes the community serious and trusts us not to overdo it.
Yep, as far as I know it came with the latest update.It wasn't a staff's decision, it just came with another XenForo update.
Okay, let me rephrase it differently:But as @danger@ already stated nobody is forcing you to use them. With the notable exception of the "thanks" button instead of countless posts with just "thanks" in them.
The Thanks button has never been gone since reactions appeared here, it's still there and works the same way. It's still just one click to throw "Thanks" to a post. Some people didn't even notice the new reactions before this thread showed up. You don't like the other reactions? Don't use them, what's the matter?What is missing is an appropriate action to make change happen.
That change is: Bring back our "thanks" - period.
Actually the dislike reaction has a neutral effect on reaction score by default, however it has had a negative effect here since the beginning.It wasn't a staff's decision, it just came with another XenForo update. Nobody here thought so deep to invent those reactions.ShelLuser said:
I actually think it's a bit of a bold move to allow us to also apply negative feedback. I pick that up as a signal that the staff takes the community serious and trusts us not to overdo it.
Why don't you guys move on to something more productive and let this thread die?
That means they don't care – in all meanings of this word.we had over 1,300 active users in last 3 months and only 45 votes were cast in this poll
As long as you think, that I'm only "trying" you may loose your merits.@getopt you are trying to show a strong voice here,
What is that supposed to mean? Is it a threat?It's not over yet.
There are the anxious ones and there are some who pretend being dangerous.What is that supposed to mean? Is it a threat?
That made no sense to me. I'll just shut up now. I'm clearly too stupid for this discussion.There are the anxious ones and there are some who pretend being dangerous.
Is that a threat?
Meaning is created on the side of the recipient. Authors are not responsible for deficits on the recipients' side, but they should take this possibility into account too.
"It's not over" is just a fact - while some prefer "feelings" instead nowadays.
Thank you for not trying to be deceptive. Trying to find what makes sense is often desired. That is the convenient part.That made no sense to me. I'll just shut up now. I'm clearly too stupid for this discussion.
That advice also applies to making a fool of oneself.Shutting up may be a temporary workaround for stupidity but you cannot overcome it with that method.
Making a fool of oneself is when you obviously fail to understand while others can easily. Some satisfaction may arise if one think having found a greater fool than oneself is, but fools typically fail to identify other fools. That's what make the world go round.That advice also applies to making a fool of oneself.
A rare case for the dislike button, but is also unnecessary.
You're the fool, and it's the fool who is so filled with emotion he doesn't realize it. It's the fool who is throwing a hissyfit. It's not surprising you didn't understand that. It's also not surprising you would come back whining and try to meaninglessly spin that around.Making a fool of oneself is when you obviously fail to understand while others can easily. Some satisfaction may arise if one think having found a greater fool than oneself is, but fools typically fail to identify other fools. That's what make the world go round.