First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So, we need to know the rate that souls are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand as souls are added. This gives two possibilities.
1) If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.
2) Of course, if Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.
So which is it ? If we accept the postulate given to me by Ms. Therese Banyan during my Freshman year that "It will be a cold night in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her, then (2) cannot be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic.
Reaction score: 216
We can pretend that the whole thing was just a misunderstanding. Here's the solution: suppose we're living in the 19th century. Now engineer doesn't mean engineer anymore. It means a locomotive driver. If we suppose there's no locomotive driver in the Forums, then the problem is solved.Well, as an engineer, this being compared with pigs hurts my feelings! We need to argue about your statement there, don't we?
It could beWell, as an engineer, this being compared with pigs hurts my feelings! We need to argue about your statement there, don't we?
Fighting an engineer in mud is like arguing with a pig.. I am an engineer by myself, but I am not sure which statement is correct .
It can be considered offensive, but not extremely offensive. Among friends or family, it can even be used in a charming fashion, e.g. when someone spills at dinner, s/he's called "Ey you pig, watch your food!".Many years ago I heard that using word "pig" is extremely offensive in Germany, specifically in Germany/Deutschland (I'm not talking about German language)
And today? Not so long ago the BND (the German secret service) was caught breaking laws. What does the ordinary citizen think? Dismiss! Punish! Make sure it never happens again! And what is the government doing? They change the laws that it is now legal what the BND does! I can't eat as much as I want to puke!In 1989/90 tons of governmental documents/papers were shreddered here in Berlin. Isn't that funny: these people committed crimes and wrote it down!
EDIT: This is meant to be a hint and kind invitation...