Did you try using the loader from 11.2? That fixed the BTX Halted issues for me.
Is the loader of 12.0 working to fix btx issue?
Did you try using the loader from 11.2? That fixed the BTX Halted issues for me.
It appears to have fixed other users BTX issues. I'm using UFS with MBR (BIOS) and it wouldn't boot with the 12.0 loader. It only boots with 11.2 . I can boot with the 13.0 loader but it's slower than 11.2.Is the loader of 12.0 working to fix btx issue?
It appears to have fixed other users BTX issues. I'm using UFS with MBR (BIOS) and it wouldn't boot with the 12.0 loader. It only boots with 11.2 . I can boot with the 13.0 loader but it's slower than 11.2.
why could it be slower?
How do I do that? Should bear in mind that I'm a novice and I just got my system up and running.Did you try using the loader from 11.2? That fixed the BTX Halted issues for me.
How do I do that? Should bear in mind that I'm a novice and I just got my system up and running.
cp loader /boot/loader
Thanks for the advise, but it doesn't crash. It just makes gives me this annoying error.I don't know how far along your install is but if you can install 11.2 and then update you can grab and backup the file that way. But the file is located at /boot/loader. They must have changed something in it why it crashes.
The BIOS error code 0x31 means “no media in drive”. I guess your driveThanks for the advise, but it doesn't crash. It just makes gives me this annoying error.
Code:BTX loader 1.00 BTX version is 1.02 Consoles: internal video/keyboard BIOS drive C: is disk0 BIOS drive D: is disk1 BIOS drive E: is disk2 BIOS drive F: is disk3 BIOS drive G: is disk4 BIOS drive H: is disk5 BIOS drive I: is disk6 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 read 1 from 0 to 0xdcc86340, error: 0x31 BIOS 621kB/3648064kB available memory FreeBSD/x86 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.1
I:
(disk6) is a CD / DVD / BD drive, and there's no disk in the drive. You can simply ignore that message, it's completely harmless.Yes, you are absolutely right. I also see these messages in my system. I searched for the meanings of these messages and realized that it's completely harmless.The BIOS error code 0x31 means “no media in drive”. I guess your driveI:
(disk6) is a CD / DVD / BD drive, and there's no disk in the drive. You can simply ignore that message, it's completely harmless.
I always wonder why some people want to get rid of messages that are known to be harmless. Does the word “error” hurt your eyes? Well, you've got the source code, so you can change it to “happy” or whatever you like. In fact you can change it directly in the /boot/loader binary with a hex editor because “error” and “happy” have the same length.I wish there was a way to stop those messages.
Well, it depends. I have some specialized hardware that works well with FreeBSD, including two trackballs (a Logitech MX Ergo and a TrackMan Marble FX).Now the next step is to get my keyboard and trackball working. Specialized hardware doesn't do well with FreeBSD I think..
That's a deeply philosophical question. And the answer is that in many cases you are correct, and one is better off living with the error message.I always wonder why some people want to get rid of messages that are known to be harmless.
ralphbsz said:Here are two attempts at a counter-argument, both of limited validity: (1) For an expert who completely understands the error message and knows for sure it's harmless, that's OK. But an amateur should always worry about errors/warnings they don't understand, because they could be signs of something serious, which might bite you later. (2) Having too many error messages that one deliberately ignores may eventually cause one to get into the habit of ignoring them. And then a really important message shows up (like "your disk is about to fail"). This is about crying "wolf" one too many times.
In this case it is really a notice. It only contains the word “error” because the loader just quotes the error code that the BIOS reports back. And in case you want to boot from the CD/DVD drive, it is actually an error if there is no disc inserted. If you don't want to boot from it, then it's not an error.I wouldn't say they are of limited validity. They are both very valid. In the case of #1 the expert should be asking if it is nothing to worry about, why is it an error instead of a notice or warning?
In this case it is really a notice. It only contains the word “error” because the loader just quotes the error code that the BIOS reports back. And in case you want to boot from the CD/DVD drive, it is actually an error if there is no disc inserted. If you don't want to boot from it, then it's not an error.
Here are two attempts at a counter-argument...
Interesting thing is I did put MacOS back on the main HDD. I did a fresh installation of FreeBSD on a second drive. When booting the system then, it goes to the Clover boot loader and then I choose the FreeBSD installation and when it boots there are no error messages.
So the question, what is in Clover Bootloader and removes those errors?
Perhaps adjusting settings in the BIOS will remove the errors.FreeBSD's boot loader uses a BIOS service (the so-called software interrupt 0x13, sometimes called “INT 13h”) to access disk drives. The error codes from the above messages (“error 0x31”) comes from that BIOS service. It is not uncommon that chaining boot loaders intercept that software interrupt for various purposes, e.g. to add more functions or to filter devices. According to your description it seems that the Clover Bootloader does that, too.
FreeBSD?its to heavy for my PC is there anything else
Imagine that. FreeBSD doesn't natively run Windows and Microsoft frameworks.
As for .NET Core... I hate to say but no-one uses it. It is just Microsoft's way of saying that they don't intend to maintain .NET for much longer and are gradually trying to cut it down in size until it fizzles out. This is exactly how large companies do product disposal without losing face.
They don't. Your lack of programming and operating system knowledge is showing.Imagine that. Linux and macOS does natively run Windows (???) and Microsoft frameworks.
plenty of .NET Core jobs out there, who knew.