The Random Thread

astyle said:
The Ports Collection does include tools for dependency analysis. Those tools do allow you to see which ports actually depend on a given port. Same information can be found on the port's FreshPorts page. And offhand, I can say with confidence that there's no ports that depend specifically on having ffmpeg3/4, only plain ffmpeg. Please prove me technically incorrect here.

A reason to have ffmpeg3/4 installed is for obscure features not found in plain ffmpeg. But you'd have to be an A/V geek (with a deep understanding of how to use ffmpeg in command-line, and to have an appreciation of the difference in results produced by the legacy versions vs the plain, up-to-date version) to actually need it all. If he has the expertise (or wants to play with different versions), more power to him.

For compilation from source into a functional DE, ffmpeg3/4 is not technically essential. Plain ffmpeg is, though. Dependency analysis will show you that much.
Click to expand...
I'm not analyzing him, I'm opining on your casual way of demeaning someone because you assume you are smarter than them.

Valid reasons that you are dismissing:
1) One likes to hoard packages for the sake of it.
2) One likes to see the computer compile.
3) One feels lazy and executes a command that includes too much stuff but doesn't care.

I'm sure there are many more.
 
ffmpeg looked complex and I haven't used it directly :p I compiled StepMania with it, and iirc think ffmpeg or libs were useful for video playback or thumbnails.

I used HandBrake for video converting and stuff with subtitles.
 
AlfredoLlaquet said:
I'm not analyzing him, I'm opining on your casual way of demeaning someone because you assume you are smarter than them.

Valid reasons that you are dismissing:
1) One likes to hoard packages for the sake of it.
2) One likes to see the computer compile.
3) One feels lazy and executes a command that includes too much stuff but doesn't care.

I'm sure there are many more.
Click to expand...
Y'know, I take care to be technical here.

Providing technical reasons for not needing something is not considered demeaning at all, at least not on these Forums. Asking someone to stick to the topic of the conversation is NOT a rude thing to say at all.

Just because I have not mentioned certain reasons why someone wants legacy versions of stuff - that does NOT mean I'm casually demeaning the other person and dismissing the reason. I'm just trying to be concise and to the point of the conversation - which is supposedly a courtesy to the other person, y'know.

I sometimes end up with more softwares than I care for - that's the price of specifying too many Makefile knobs.

Besides, both me and Alain De Vos have been around these Forums for years longer than you, AlfredoLlaquet ... We do have a handle on how to talk to each other.
😼
 
astyle said:
Y'know, I take care to be technical here.

Providing technical reasons for not needing something is not considered demeaning at all, at least not on these Forums. Asking someone to stick to the topic of the conversation is NOT a rude thing to say at all.

Just because I have not mentioned certain reasons why someone wants legacy versions of stuff - that does NOT mean I'm casually demeaning the other person and dismissing the reason. I'm just trying to be concise and to the point of the conversation - which is supposedly a courtesy to the other person, y'know.

I sometimes end up with more softwares than I care for - that's the price of specifying too many Makefile knobs.

Besides, both me and Alain De Vos have been around these Forums for years longer than you, AlfredoLlaquet ... We do have a handle on how to talk to each other.
😼
Click to expand...
Saying "Did you notice that others are labeled as "Legacy"? Ever wonder why?" has nothing to do with all those convoluted reasons.

Edit: It's better to say, "Why do you have also the legacy packages?" That is not belittling.

I'm out of this conversation.

😴
 
Indifference-ninja said:
So I have another update; due to some unforeseen circumstances I'm not sure when I'll be able to get a monitor cord now.
However I will still be lurking around until then.
Click to expand...
So apparently the tower needs a 9 pin female but the monitor needs a 15 pin male cable, and I bought a 15 pin male-male cord, ugh!
Well at least I also got a 32 gb USB stick to put freebsd on.
 
Alain De Vos said:
My personal problem is converting videos towards an audio-codec my DVD driver understands. With never videos always fail ...
Click to expand...
I never watch videos directly from DVD - too much annoying garbage ("features") If I want to see a movie I want to see that movie, and no animated menus, especially nothing of all this "extra" and "making of" BS. ("producer's commentary" - does anybody actually watch those?)
What I do is a full BU to storage drive with dvdbackup first - depending on the DVD this lasts between several minutes up to some hours. After that I use handbrake (there are for sure other/better solutions, but I'm used to it, and it's easy to use) to create a .m4v-videofile from it - easy to select which audio tracks (language) I want to have. I never had any problems with languages/audio so far.

cracauer@ said:
I spent 3 months nose down with ffmpeg correcting the green tint on the original Fellowship of the Ring Blu-Ray.
Click to expand...
I never got any BD running on FreeBSD. AFAIK it's all about the right keys.
Can you link to some working How-to, describe what's needed (you done) to get BDs running, or at least point me into the right direction?
Thanks.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top