Uhhh... within US, Internet is actually considered a utility, on par with electricity, gas and water.
Yeah. John Brunner, 'The Shockwave Rider'
And based on that idea, there are actually programs to reduce cost of access, even to the point of giving free smartphones (well, cheapest possible new models, though) to the homeless people. Participation, though, is voluntary - if you can't understand how that benefits you, it's your loss.
It benefits the authorities. Instead of doing the work they are supposed to do, idem, in a democratic society, to
serve the public, they just install some broken web-app, getting bakschisch from the developing shop on the way, and some very overpriced bill for the taxpayer.
Yeah, that did result in homeless people in Manhattan congregating around coffee shops, libraries, etc., and surfing for porn in public. ? Other than that, the access to Internet did improve overall for that segment of the population. No, tiny screens are not the most convenient thing to use to fill out paperwork that asks for help with things like money, employment, etc. But it's still something.
But man, you live so far out you don't even have a library or another place with public Internet access???
A library? In a 600 people village?
Well, you're the one who gets to decide whether that's worthwhile or not, this is not for anyone to judge.
When I travelled east Asia, there are coffeehops everywhere (and that was 20 years ago). But here, I haven't seen any - probably there are some in the immigrant's ghettos. Otherwise people are supposed to buy their own gear - but basically they don't need it. Nowadays having a new smartphone has become an insignia of status, mainly among the underdogs. Obviousely you can't do much useful things with such a gadget, except watch advertisements and buy useless stuff. So that's probably the whole point in it all.
There are complaints that the government needs to do more for "digiization" - but then, as a matter of fact everything works well without, so the question must be asked: who wants that "digitization" so eagerly and for what benefit?
If the benefit ist just to force people so they cannot do without any longer, then that is not a benefit, it's the opposite.
Also, I for my part have an understanding of
responsibility, and that includes technological impact assessment. So if there is a new technology, which is not actually needed by ordinary people (because everything worked without before), but is complicated and involves new risks, then it is
definitely wrong to force people to use it.