Yes, contrary to SUN, Oracle actually likes to make money. Which is why SUN had to be sold in the first place.oliverh said:@matty well I read this, but the path for the future is clear. Oracle is a company of the 80s ...
Jago said:Yes, contrary to SUN, Oracle actually likes to make money. Which is why SUN had to be sold in the first place.
olav said:Woha, already 28! That means its hopefully considered stable/production ready within 12 months?
gilinko said:Nope. It will only be included in the release of FreeBSD 9.0(not scheduled yet, I think). There is a point of no return at version 16 if I remember it correctly.
phoenix said:Huh?
Upgrading a pool to version X means that version X-anything cannot access it. But, this is the first I've heard of a "point of no return".
Version 19 is when all the pieces fall into place for an (almost) bullet-proof pool: l2arc removal, slog removal, txg roll-back (or is that 20?), etc.
But there's no "point of no return".
Isn't it already?mix_room said:http://netmgt.blogspot.com/2010/08/solaris-11-2011-confirmed.htmlPython inclusion in base springs to mind.
OpenIndiana is part of the Illumos Foundation, and provides a true open source community
alternative to Solaris 11 and Solaris 11 Express, with an open development model and full community participation.
vermaden said:Pawel Jakub Dawidek just ported ZFS v28 to FreeBSD, new code is ready for testing (and bug hunting):
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2010-August/019541.html
Jeff Bonwick was a Senior Software Architect at Sun/Oracle until his departure from the company on 30 September 2010. He led the team which developed ZFS for Solaris.
hansivers said:Well, another week, another senior Sun engineer leaving Oracle..
http://blogs.sun.com/bonwick/entry/and_now_page_2