Thanks for pointing out the error!
Ahsoka
Ahsoka
I also enjoy these latest start wars series.
Seems you have a real clock on sight as you don't have it in the workspace.
Nah! You have to distinguish the three original George Lucas movies from 1977, 1980, and 1983,I don't like Star Wars at all
Lucas is a great in the cinema, but that kind of saga is far from my taste.Nah! You have to distinguish the three original George Lucas movies from 1977, 1980, and 1983,
from this computer overanimated, overdone Disney action orgys.![]()
I keep confusing it with Star Trek even these daysI don't like Start Wars at all
Ghost In The Shell went in that direction, too. I'm not wild about overuse of computer graphics capabilities that comes at the expense of telling a good story. I got more to say, but that would go off-topic.from this computer overanimated, overdone Disney action orgys.
Spelling alert. (SCNR)I also enjoy these latest start wars series.
Texas guy with a Boise State theme?FreeBSD 14.2 running on Xfce 4.2View attachment 21908
ya! just noticed the START wars, well after that post it seems I have started a star wars discussion after allSpelling alert. (SCNR)
This is kind of confusing Bonanza with Billy the Kidkeep confusing it with Star Trek even these days![]()
Yeah, but I haven't seen either Star Trek or Star Wars, so I never understand the references that are made to either of those. And going by name, the difference is only 50%, even less if you want to get technical.This is kind of confusing Bonanza with Billy the Kid
4chan
is a reference to, and why Pepe the Frog is an expression of disdain (as well as where that expression is likely to be understood correctly).No. It's fact. When watching the critical drinker taking a movie apart is more fun than watching said movie, something is wrong with that movie.It's my opinion.
Strange dudes with strange hats riding on horses? From over here, it looks just the same.This is kind of confusing Bonanza with Billy the Kid
Nah.Yeah, but I haven't seen either Star Trek or Star Wars, so I never understand the references that are made to either of those. And going by name, the difference is only 50%, even less if you want to get technical.
FreeBSD consumes a lot of the machine resources, in the FreeBSD policy somewhere I read that software/hardware support is mainly for scare resource machines.
FreeBSD consumes barely any resources.FreeBSD consumes a lot of the machine resources
Exactly the opposite.FreeBSD consumes a lot of the machine resources
In the screenshots (graphical desktop environments or window managers) you can see high resource consumption for example 3257 MiB from where I started my answer.Exactly the opposite.
And since where there's a 1:1 relation between memory usage and resource consumption in Unix?In the screenshots (graphical desktop environments or window managers) you can see high resource consumption for example 3257 MiB from where I started my answer.
The ram memory displays only a part of the hardware that may be consuming the other hardware of the machine. On low resource machines it is necessary to take into account when doing critical work such as compiling or viewing videos on YouTube unless the consumption immediately goes through the roof.And since where there's a 1:1 relation between memory usage and resource consumption in Unix?