AI for writing documentation

Yeah. And, I know that (is why I'm not on social media or stuff). ...Just sort of depressing though (ai); I'm just contemplating licensing. -i.e. not sure if I've ever truly contemplated if someone were to use *my* code to actually "kick puppies". Kind of a #BurnItDownAndStartAgainMaybeWeCanDoBetterNextTime kind of thought.
 
Just had a conversation with Google.
Answer of Google A.I. : - I put words into your mouth you did not used.

Google becoming a manipulative politician. Time to read 1984.
 
The truly scary part of that thought is that people will still blindly trust it because it is the "easy button". -i.e. I can see using it for collating, finding, and maybe possibly suggesting but at no time should the output be trusted (but now, we're back to the crux of this thread's topic; at what point does it become easier to just do something yourself?).

I still think that upper case 'i' needs to be lower case because its intelligence isn't deserving of an upper-case classification.
 
An AI seems to be able to write better than a human being these days... perfect mastery of English language, sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, even striking a "technical report" tone, and mentioning uncertainty.

I recently came across a fine example of that: https://windowsforum.com/threads/kb...-driver-timeouts-in-windows-11-gaming.393563/

If you pay attention to who exactly wrote that article, it's freakin' ChatGPT!

There's a pretty long list of checkboxes for what makes a well-written article. All those checkboxes are stuff that people are normally taught in k-12 primary education systems. And ChatGPT seems to have hit them all. Somebody's too lazy and unskilled to put in the effort it takes to hit even half the checkboxes on that list, so they outsource the work to ChatGPT. This is how ChatGPT will take away people's jobs. All that will be left is hosing down the machines that mine the raw silicon for Intel and Qualcomm.
😩
 
astyle said:
Somebody's too lazy and unskilled to put in the effort it takes to hit even half the checkboxes on that list, so they outsource the work to ChatGPT. This is how ChatGPT will take away people's jobs. All that will be left is hosing down the machines that mine the raw silicon for Intel and Qualcomm.
Click to expand...
Who's the audience that article is for? Microsoft has official notes with the same text and descriptions, officially. I install updates and don't expect breaking changes and don't read notes :p If I needed deeper info, MDL/etc has actual people decompiling and examining updates, and that kind of info isn't plainly-detailed in the open for AI to be able to try to construe into a nice-looking article.
 
Espionage724 said:
Who's the audience that article is for? Microsoft has official notes with the same text and descriptions, officially. I install updates and don't expect breaking changes and don't read notes :p If I needed deeper info, MDL/etc has actual people decompiling and examining updates, and that kind of info isn't plainly-detailed in the open for AI to be able to try to construe into a nice-looking article.
Click to expand...
I would not be surprised if the LLMs (that were used to write that article) are available by subscription / fee only. Same idea as legal databases of court cases, enterprise licenses and ACM articles. Very common practice for places like windowsforums.com to have a few such subscriptions as business expenses.

It's amazing what you can find on the Internet if you just bother to look.

Curating information is one thing. Understanding the information, realizing if it's applicable to the situation at hand - or realizing that something is just plain bullshit or nonsense - that's a different thing altogether.
 
AlfredoLlaquet said:
I thank the Romans every day for the alphabet.
Click to expand...
Actually the latin letters became by a modificated mix of greek and etruscan. But the system per se was revolutionary. It's called a phonetic language. Roman writing system was neither the only one, nor the first. Greek, hebrew, arabic, cyrillic are examples for others. It just became the standard, because the romans conquered most of europe, north africa and the "middle east", latin was until the middle ages what is english today, the most used language to communicate internationally, and then, after 1492, the europeans then impressed their stamps on the world, including calendar, the roman language(s)... many good things, many bad things.

At the first glance it seems to be way more easy to have signs in form of pictures showing directly what's meant, instead of the need to learn the whole alphabet and the combination of letters first before you even can start writing and reading. But in the mid term it becomes clear: You need much painting, so much more effort writing and still not being clear what's actually meant. Not everybody has a talent in sketching. Or using standardized and then way more signs to be learned. So better is to use only a few letters which in combination portray the sounds of spoken words: phonetic.

To me that's like the difference between vi and emacs. You either have to learn the complete alphabet and the art of combination first before you can do anything with it at all. But once you have that, that's it. Or you have to learn a new sign - key-combo - for everything new you need to do, having hundreds of "signs" never stop learning.😁😎
 
Maturin said:
Actually the latin letters became by a modificated mix of greek and etruscan.
Click to expand...

Wait... don't you always say the German's invented all these things?

Here in States we speak "English"... because well.... we didn't invent that either :cool:

I guess "there is" a difference between "British English English" and "American English". Should we say "mac" or "rain coat"?

"And the banker never wears a mac in the pouring rain, very strange". --- the Beatles, Penny Lane
 
Ai output is based on statistics so it's output cannot be profound in the same sense as a human's (because it can only operate on the information it has and not on conjecture). -i.e. Proper/correct word use: yes. New terms: no. Concepts: yes. Ramifications of situation X: limited. Code to "produce a random number": only good enough to pass the given test definition of a random number (never above and beyond).

Eventually, all write-ups the same. ...one of us!
 
In a literal sense if AI wrote a book would it be considered Fact or Fiction ?

Since the author did not actually experience the topic I would assume it falls under Fiction.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top