Slop Free Software

That's a great slop guide. I appreciate that they add the use case for the "AI". Some of the listed projects are using "AI" for code review but not for contribution. That's interesting.

Well, I did notice some "AI" commits in FreeBSD, they have 3 listed. :/
 
Well, seeing the list for FreeBSD commits using "AI" is no bueno for me. I guess I'll need to start getting some things together for moving systems over to NetBSD for the time being and hopefully the Core Team will release a policy soon. Ughhhh.........
 
Well, seeing the list for FreeBSD commits using "AI" is no bueno for me. I guess I'll need to start getting some things together for moving systems over to NetBSD for the time being and hopefully the Core Team will release a policy soon. Ughhhh.........
The tension is rising. Waiting for the first open source operating systems to sell their soul for a lot of money. Imagine Red Hat and Ubuntu taking government money to introduce the mandated standards. It wouldn't surprise me at all. The "enterprise" aiming distributions don't care and will try to eliminate competition with it. "They don't want age verification? That's nice..."
 
The tension is rising. Waiting for the first open source operating systems to sell their soul for a lot of money. Imagine Red Hat and Ubuntu taking government money to introduce the mandated standards. It wouldn't surprise me at all. The "enterprise" aiming distributions don't care and will try to eliminate competition with it. "They don't want age verification? That's nice..."
Sure, that's possible. It is hard to say no to contributions that come with financial strings attached. I wouldn't expect anything like that to be a likely outcome. I mean, it's likely going to come down to a few outcomes and the one least likely to fill dockets for years to come is most likely to occur. So, if it's ownership for the owners of the program that generates slop or the ownership goes to project devs who knows. But ownership is going to be decided at some point. Commercial software isn't a charity.
 
Sure, that's possible. It is hard to say no to contributions that come with financial strings attached. I wouldn't expect anything like that to be a likely outcome. I mean, it's likely going to come down to a few outcomes and the one least likely to fill dockets for years to come is most likely to occur. So, if it's ownership for the owners of the program that generates slop or the ownership goes to project devs who knows. But ownership is going to be decided at some point. Commercial software isn't a charity.
What I expect is that it's going to be in hardware. AI and age verification, and a few other recent OS-related implementations are all about the same goal: create an anvironment in software that is 100% abstracted from the hardware to seize the highest authority, beyond the physical user of the computer. Phone systems are already done in the factory. You can't run anything else than Android or iOS and you can't exit the system to metal level. The "keyboard" is a user-level program. It's no wired keyboard like USB on a PC. This is going to end too. The last real admin permissions on a consumer computer. Everything ruled by companies.
 
*click-click*

After reading up on a few in that list and I saw Vim and the "hard fork" called "eVI". A few more clicks and I thought I'd share the resulting quote from a discussion.
> > :) now we just gotta find people who know vimscript and c...
> yeah, thankfully i know some C, but not vimscript... i just used vim
> for editing things. i could also invite you to the repo if you want,
> but if you don't want that it's all good! :3
i'd love to help :)
but i don't know c or vimscript yet...
oh well...may return to this when i do learn c...
(postmarketos porting might force me to anyways...)
*face-palm*

I don't know about you but I trust someone seasoned enough with a code base and/or language to judge the validity of a Ai code submission over a self-proclaimed novice (who just [hard] forked the code on a whim).
 
If reference to the link's "AI influenced software":

I've always maintained the position that AI should be kept in the lab, not allowed to roam free in the wild. Use of AI for code reviews isn't problematic for me as long as code is human reviewed FIRST, and if the reviewers show a history of missing things that the AI picks up afterwards then their performance reviews should reflect accordingly.
 
Oh man, Hugo uses "AI" and that's what was used to make the new website.

oh-god-oh-man.gif
 
Back
Top