you should definitely ready my post again as I don't see where I mentioned consul and docker in the same sentence.
Well, this is sort of a "Docker" thread. It is not unreasonable to expect that one would be trying to address the topic of Docker and alternatives, not propose unrelated solutions with completely different purposes, duuh.
Chill down, lest you get a heart attack
According to FreeBSD descriptions, consul is for "Service discovery and configuration" and traefik is a "High availability reverse proxy and load balancer". Close enough, they are definitely the same layer, way above container engines/Docker.
cheers man! I had no idea
Again, this is sort of a "Docker" and/or containerization engine thread. One would expect adequate suggestions and it feels fine to point out things that are a little bit out of the whack.
sure they're not friendly.
link link
Hehe, ok. It is something one should take a closer look at. Nevertheless it is only a 3rd party plugin to nomad. So we get to the situation that was previously ridiculed in this thread with respect to Linux/Docker, "front-end to this is a back-end to that" lol
So to get out of it a slightest resemblance to Docker (still without hierarchical images and compositions) you would need to put together Nomad, the jail-task-driver and pot. I think this is a strong argument in favor of
Focker