I'm
fairly certain that the detailed formulae were humorous. The humour is not lost on me

but I can't be certain.
It all depends on how you define humour

It can be called a black/dark humour. The logic of it is irrefutable, so it's a reasoning "ad absurdum" - it means that our assumptions were wrong. We usually silently assume that everything can be judged by its "absolute value", while in reality there's no such thing, it is only a construct of our brains, and as such it is just a subjective property. The problem arises when people try to make/perceive it as an "objective" reality - in terms of absolute value. It gives a rise to:
1. Fascist-like views - nazism that claims Disabled/Gypsies/Jews/Poles/etc. are worthless; libertarianism that claims poor people are worthless, racialism that claims "black"/"white"/"yellow" people are worthless; etc.
2. Communistic-like views, that try to claim that everyone is equal, and effectively making all people worthless, as the true history of communism shows - but not many people (want to) know that communism killed more people than nazism, because it's "in such a good cause".
Because of all this, it's impossible to make all people believe in such false views without some sort of totalitarianism.
So what's the best thing we can do? Word "Equal" assumes an ability to give absolute value, so instead of saying "Everyone is equal" we should say "Everyone is equally important". If we all were rocket scientists we would all die from hunger. We need people with different skills, interests, abilities, point of views, etc. but we should give to all people a chance for education, because it increases their subjective "value", and it makes the world a better place (yes, even if not all want to educate themselves). Of course one should remember that education doesn't mean "forcing someone to have the same point of view as me", it is rather "show/explain to them consequences of their actions"

So in terms of this forum, instead of ignoring people we should try to explain to "bad behaviourers" their wrongdoings (and be open to possibility that actually *we* may be the wrongdoers) because even if it won't work for the wrondoer someone else may learn from it.