Ilovehotdog, it's surprisingly doable to stick with some of the older programs, though not all of them. I don't think there is a console browser that works on modern web pages, and though I still use mutt for email, I have it set to open a browser for some html mail and zathura for pdfs. However, there is a pdf2txt, don't know how well it works.
Anyway, there is already GhostBSD for a newcomer friendly version. My argument against making FreeBSD too newcomer friendly is that we've seen in Linux how doing so can often make it more difficult for the experienced to do what they're used to. Though, despite what you might have seen on the forums, I think that those who understand what will actually happen if KDE is added to the install, realize that it is simply an option which they can choose to use or not use.
If I'm not mistaken, you mentioned you use ArchLinux, or have used it. I think FreeBSD is best being sort of like that--default is a quick CLI install, and afterwards, the user can add a GUI, or make it a DNS server, or a Samba server or whatever. Its slogan is The Power To Serve, and it excels at that. Even though RH, at least in the US, has more of the server market, it is where FreeBSD's strength is. Like
bakul said, commenting here is unlikely to influence the direction. It's fine to voice your opinion of course, but again as
bakul said, your best bet to help is getting involved. There are different ways to do that.
https://docs.freebsd.org/en/articles/contributing/
Or, you can get involved by simply having your own pages of information. I believe that someone on these forums mentioned that they'd tried to do some official documentation, but that there were various strictures that made it unpleasant so they just started their own site. (I'm going by vague memory so I could be wrong). Lots of people though, have sites with useful information on Linux, FreeBSD, both, or all sorts of computer information, e.g, opensource plus Mac and Windows stuff.
This isn't a criticism. It's just saying that while you might have opinions on where FreeBSD is going or should go, if you confine those opinions to these forums, they're not going to have effect on the future of FreeBSD. The length of this thread shows that, I think, it's gone one for a lot of posts with many of us just wanting to give our opinion, but it's sort of a bikeshed discussion. (I think I've posted the link before, but if you're unfamiliar with the the term
https://bikeshed.com/).