What do you think about a "SteamBSD" machine ?

NapoleonWils0n said:
The only person who knows about this stuff is shkhln
who wrote the linux-steam-utils

From his previous post about AI projects using his work i think highly unlikely he would want to be involved
Click to expand...

I find it hard to believe that the only possible answers are highly technical ones. I think it is possible to discuss complex projects in a more casual way. As someone who isn't a programmer, I wouldn't be able to hold my own in a highly technical discussion—I freely admit I don't know how to program (in classical terms). However, I can engage in discussions involving low to medium technical complexity, and that is the kind of response I expect from you.
 
sualbee said:
Maybe sometimes silence can be more eloquent than words? Besides, no one is forced to be interested in the projects you choose to participate in, even if they find them useful.
Click to expand...

Not if I’m portrayed as a chatterbox who produces nothing.

Not if you (plural) urge me to show you something when I’ve already done so, but you (plural) ignore it.

You (plural) talk too much. I've already produced more useful and complex projects than you (plural) in your (plural) whole life.
 
I have never used Steam

im not a C programmer,
dont know anything about Kernel development or the graphics stack

If people dont know about a subject then they cant have a discussion about it

I can only tell you about the process i go though to create projects,
which involves reading all the documentation,
understand how everything work and then developing the logic to implement the idea.

shkhln is the only person who knows about this and you asked if he wanted to colloborate,
he didnt respond, so he doesnt
 
NapoleonWils0n said:
I have never used Steam

im not a C programmer,
dont know anything about Kernel development or the graphics stack

If people dont know about a subject then they cant have a discussion about it

I can only tell you about the process i go though to create projects,
which involves reading all the documentation,
understand how everything work and then developing the logic to implement the idea.

shkhln is the only person who knows about this and you asked if he wanted to colloborate,
he didnt respond, so he doesnt
Click to expand...


It seems you don't have a good imagination. I want stimulate you a little bit.
  1. From the screenshot, which elements indicate that FreeBSD is running as the host system while Debian is running as a guest inside QEMU?
  2. What is the difference between running Debian in QEMU with full CPU emulation and using QEMU with hardware acceleration through a hypervisor such as bhyve/vmm? How could you verify which mode is being used?
  3. Assuming the Debian VM needs to communicate both with the FreeBSD host and with the local network, which virtual networking configurations could be used, and what are the differences between NAT, bridge, and TAP?
  4. How could you determine, from inside the Debian VM, which devices are virtualized by QEMU and which devices, if any, have been assigned directly to the VM through PCI passthrough?
  5. If you wanted to make this VM configuration persistent, which QEMU configuration components would you need to save in addition to the disk image—for example CPU, RAM, PCI devices, networking, and firmware—in order to restart it later with the same virtual hardware setup?
 
ZioMario said:
Not if you (plural) urge me to show you something when I’ve already done so, but you (plural) ignore it.
Click to expand...
Where did I urge you to show me anything? I'm really not interested in your tinkering with LLMs at all, and that's the whole point. Just stop saying that you're an artist, because this isn't art, and you're not even the one making it.

ZioMario said:
You (plural) talk too much. I've already produced more useful and complex projects than you (plural) in your (plural) whole life.
Click to expand...
Sorry to hear that.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top