www/firefox-esr weighs half a GB (511017732), and the cleaner www/librewolf — the whole of gigabyte (903353725) in .tar.gz… Why?Have a look on Librewolf, that's a cleaner version of Firefox...
www/firefox-esr weighs half a GB (511017732), and the cleaner www/librewolf — the whole of gigabyte (903353725) in .tar.gz… Why?Have a look on Librewolf, that's a cleaner version of Firefox...
Yep, just like Fennec on Android, it disables a layer of crap built onto Firefox (really shameful...) but no more.Librewolf is my choice and I'm happy it made it to the ports. But the buggers just won't listen. Check your browsers ( https://coveryourtracks.eff.org, or maybe https://browseraudit.com, feel free to expand this tiny list). I hope you don't mind your User-Agent string being reported as a Windows *whatever version. You want privacy? Checked. You want functionality at the same time? Checked. You want zero ads? Checked (uBo). The team behind Librewolf removed some of the cruft, but there is still a long way to go. That's a definition for a good start. Not advocating here, just saying.
Well I guess it's because as I said the team disables elements, and does not remove them (for instance, you can enable FF Sync easily)... That's much of a Firefox where everything in about:config is properly set, but you can do it manually on Firefox.www/firefox-esr weighs half a GB (511017732), and the cleaner www/librewolf — the whole of gigabyte (903353725) in .tar.gz… Why?
One of my more memorable career moments is when we had a company all-hands to discuss the horrific new website design. The head of marketing made the unfortunate decision to say that it was the result of user studies. Our CEO was a Stanford linguistics professor who did statistical language research, and absolutely hated the new design. He immediately demanded to see the data and analysis. There was none, of course. The real story is our marketing chief had hired some buddy of his to do the redesign, and the new hotness at the time was the color Orange. One of my colleagues accurately described it as "technicolor vomit."Nah, no way. These decisions are made on a whim by product managers. Sometimes they say the decision is "data driven", but they never reveal anything about how the data came together and was processed.
if it could pipe urls through a filter to achieve e.g. ad block - that would be neat!www/surf, did I mention surf? No frills, no tabs, no buttons, just a rectangle with www content
To each his own, I guess?I used to use Librewolf on FreeBSD, but I moved back to Firefox, I can't remember why...
www/falkon works fine, seems to do things most people use a browser for. Although feeling lighter and swifter than www/firefox, the www/dooble I try now is doing the same as Falkon but faster.I intend to give Falkon a try. Any thoughts for or against ?
I do remember now, as I ran it on another computer earlier todau... That's just because Librewolf breaks extensions ! I always use uBlock and NoScript, but there's no way to display the settings...!To each his own, I guess?
Sorry, what? uBlockOrigin comes as default, and for the settings, just hit the hamburger(?) menu, top-right. Unless I am missing something.I do remember now, as I ran it on another computer earlier todau... That's just because Librewolf breaks extensions ! I always use uBlock and NoScript, but there's no way to display the settings...!
Fully agree for Thunderbird. Very bad UI but cannot find alternative client. Windows Live Mail was good (for Windows). Outlook Express was similar or better. Unfortunately they both were discontinued for unknown reason.Are there any alternatives to Firefox and Thunderbird? Did pkg upgrade and ended up with the new versions with updated UI. I can't f#@%ing stand them. Literally the worst UI redesign since the history of personal computing. Are people jumping the ship, and if so, where do we go?
I intend to give Falkon a try. Any thoughts for or against ?
⋯ curious as to how Firefox can be ruined by a UI redesign
Because some hotshot just out of college with a design degree says "It's better".
These decisions are made on a whim by product managers. ⋯
Bullshit … My guess would be they're building an "embeddable" messaging client, and/or repositioning it to touchscreen devices.
To be honest, I am now browsing this thread trying to find what I reacted on with that post, and I couldn't. I think it was related to somebody's else post, but the context evades me. I was not trying to imply anything, and I do apologize if this seemed to be out of line and misdirected - that was not my intention.I can find the truth, and share it privately away from cries of bullshit.
I'll share a shot of Thunderbird.