There are too many social and other media sites

Good bread is like wine or cheese: The same ingredients can lead to completely different results, depending on the fermentation's conditions. And it needs ripeness (the unbaked dough, of course.) Not weeks, or months, like wine or cheese, but hours to days.

It cannot simply be done by mixing the ingredients, let the yeast prove the dough, then bake it. Well, it can - if the result satisfies you. That's all what a bread machine does: mixing and baking. It cannot watch or rate the grade of the dough's ripeness, because that's a complex proccess involving several parameters like kinds and quality of flours used, possible additional ingredients, temperature, humidity... Those cannot simply be measured and evaluated with our kitchen equipment. You need the experience of many breads baked, keep an eye on the dough, smell it,...to get a good and tasty bread.

I wouldn't started to bake my own bread if there were bakeries left within a reasonable distance still baking good bread. But most bakeries switched to frozen par-baked breads they buy from industrial mass production and let their saleswomen finish them in the shop's oven directly. (That's why you often get in different "bakeries" in different regions the exact same supply offered.) Of course, it's less work for the bakery. You don't need qualified bakers anymore, trained saleswomen do. The quality is low(er), but constant and predictable. And most people buy it. If they don't buy their bread in supermarkets, which is even more convient to buy everything in a single location, even if the quality is even lower.
But once you ate a good, artisanal produced bread, you not only know why I'm talking of "low" quality of industrial products, but you also want it again - best being your daily bread.
While the whole world bakes bread mostly from wheat only, in Germany, and probably other countries too, maybe Poland, Czechia,... - I don't know, we prefer bread not only made from sourdough but also from a mixture of wheat and ray flours: dark, dense, small porous, characteristic own taste: typical german bread
We cut our bread in slices of ~0.5...1cm, spread butter on it, and place thin slices of cheese, ham, salami, other sausages or other stuff like jam on it. Those are commonly eaten for breakfast or supper, (in germany commonly lunch is dinner.)
For most others, our bread is too heavy, tastes too strange, when you're used to light whitebreads, only. "Extreme" cases are black bread, very popular in west-nothern germany (you can get it even in restaurants as a dish, served e.g. with typical, small nordsea shrimp and fried eggs), or it's "most extreme" variant Pumpernickel, which ain't made from a dough at all, but is in fact only ray grist (only roughly grinded wholemeal ray) sintered for many hours at low temperatures - very special, very tasty, very nutrishing.

You can make a German living in France, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, UK,... especially outside Europe a real joyfully gift by bringing a loaf of good german bread. Not that there were bad breads - in contrary, I know and appriciate the good breads baked in the whole world, but if you've grown up with german bread you simply insist on have such once in a while.
And if you cannot buy one, for whatever reasons, you start baking yourself.
Which, as I said, is not really that much work. It's four working steps of a few minutes each. The rest of the time, you just wait your dough ferments.

But to give you something you can see ripeness makes a difference: You talked pizza dough. Really simple in fact: wheat flour, water, a tiny bit of salt, and yeast. Some may add a tiny dash of olive oil, but that's it. No eggs, and above all no sugar! It's not a cake!
Next time you plan to bake pizza, plan some days ahead. Start your dough: mix the ingredients and knead the dough the first time, but use very few yeast, point of a knife. The dough will take several hours to prove (over night). Knead it good again, put it into some closed tupperware box at least twice the size (plastic bag will also do), and put it in the fridge(!) for two or three days. Then take it out a couple of hours before you bake, and let it prove again. You already will smell the difference, when you take the dough out, and you will see: your pizza also tastes better.
 
Some of You may know that I have jewish ancestors, and worse, some of them were officially recognized victims of racial prosecution in Germany.

So when I encountered this posting here, I found it quite unsettling, and felt the need for further investigations:

Due to this I got into contact with social media, and tried to understand, from a perspective of communications theory and systems theory, how social media is supposed to work.

At some point then it came to my mind that, during that process, I had acquired and developed all necessary data to porperly expain the phenomenon that the thread-opener complains about. So in a two-fold approach I decided write down these explanation, once to enlighten the OP and possibly others (and this was apparently well received, there was a bunch of thanks), and twice to store and preserve my own thoughts for later retrieval.

To my great surprize I now find this note:
xy.png


You must understand that my texts are all written spontaneously, they are original and creative, have not been written before and will probably never we written again (unless explicitely copied).

So this is where it gets crazy, because an immediate genuin human thought is authentic as it is, it has been devised creatively in that very moment, so it is entirely impossible for it to be "disinformation" (because disinformation would imply falsehood, while authenticity makes falsehood impossible).
So, as the claim of "disinformation" is impossible, and there is still a confession, the verdict must be considered intentional vandalism.

Otherwise, there is only one place in my life where I encountered such before, that is when as a student I ventured into the MSB (marxistischer StudentenBund). There I tried to discuss thinks that I had experienced in my life, and got rebuttal as follows: personal experience is entirely irrelevant, because the only relevant information is in the documents we receive from the Kremlin.

Also we must consider that these kinds of totalitarian viewpoints will not simply end with censorship. They will continue with boycott demands, then concentration camps and finally mass killings.

And there is another issue. It seems commonly agreed that intellectual property has a value. So, what I am writing here genuinely, the creative output of my mind, might be considered intellectual property and associated with a value. I do notmally not care about that, because the most common consideration with intellectual property is as a creator to deny others the right to use it, which in my eyes is pointless: ideas should be used, copied, commented, developed onwards by as many as possible in oder to advance humanity.

But here the case is different, here the case is to deliberately destroy genuin content so that nobody ever can retrieve and use it, and when indeed intellectual property has a value, then the perpetrator of the destruction is liable for compensation.
 
So this is where it gets crazy, because an immediate genuin human thought is authentic as it is, it has been devised creatively in that very moment, so it is entirely impossible for it to be "disinformation" (because disinformation would imply falsehood, while authenticity makes falsehood impossible).
These your notes make me think to Six Thinking Hats - Edward De Bono, and the advice of the book can apply also to social media and forums discussions. Ok, they can barely apply to your case, but I indeed liked to much the book for not citing it! :-)

You can analyze things from many orthogonal point of views, and use them for figuring out a pondered decision. You can list facts, and these must be precise. You can express feelings, and it is fair that feelings can be not completely rationals. You can try to be optimistic, and then pessimistic. If I'm describing the worst possible outcome, you cannot accuse me of being pessimistic, because it is the premise of my current partial analysis. Later there will be space for the optimistic considerations. And finally you can "sum" up the various orthogonal parts.

I liked very much your deleted post. Maybe not 100% correct, but who bothers. When something is sincere, there is always a grain of truth. And this is again the point of the book. There is rarely a single truth about complex and/or social things. Truth is often the union of different point of views.
 
Back
Top