The Random Thread

Spectrum's a cool transmog on Diablo 3 :p

Capture.PNG
 
Yes, they (spectrum) just raised our rate. (NYC). However, my wife has realized she doesn't use the TV, so we'll be able to save a bit by getting rid of that part of it.
 
scottro Spectrum raised my internet rate, too, by five dollars with no notice. Spectrum gives a good rate on phone, too, that includes international calling when I travel. Phone usage is all Verizon. But that means I'm stuck with Spectrum should I ever want to change to something else.

Dealing with ATT is good. Dealing with ATT billing is pure hell.

ATT fiber is now available on my street after a decade or more of me looking out my front window at their fiber box across the street. But 600Mb up/down is good enough for us.
 
In Barcelona I get 1Gb fiber and unlimited data on my phone (so I can go to Starbucks and spend the day there with my laptop connected to the internet through my phone) for 78,13€/month (taxes included). I may be paying too much. I should call the company one of this days and try to get a better deal.
 
I actually combatted an earlier price range by lowering my speed. I forget the figures, but the lessening of speed didn't have any noticeable effect. As we all know in the US, there's no real competition.
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0ilMx7k7mso
from 12 years ago is still true. In NYC we have Spectrum and Verizon FIOS and they'll be about the same. One might offer a lower price as an introductory offer, but it's not worth the effort.
What I will say for spectrum is that if you reach their tech support, you usually get a knowledgeable person, but I've not needed their support in years--so I would also have to say, for them, they're pretty reliable here.
 
The last word of the following post only appears in that post in the whole forum up until now.

roddierod

Post in thread 'Why Never Follow Schedule?'

drhowarddrfine said:
Aside:
The reason this is the only forum I hang out at anymore is to avoid such statements and comments. I've noticed an influx of people, along with an increase in Linux questions, just over the last few months. Making statements like this that I've never seen in the 9 years I've visited this board and the original one many of us know about. Despite the "Moderated" thread, if this is the result of less moderation, we all suffer because of it.
Click to expand...

and I thought it was just me getting old and can cantankerous...
 
USerID said:
A question for Solaris OS experts: why isn't Oracle's Solaris popular on the desktop today?
Click to expand...

(Maybe?) I can fill in some of this:

Oracle bought Sun Microsystems -- aka "SUN".

The Solaris O/S is an upgraded Operating System from an older Sun Microsystems O/S called "SunOS". Many of us are slightly biased to "SunOS" because it was based on a Berkeley Unix Variant (*BSD) -- which made the O/S closer to FreeBSD and the other *BSD operating systems in general. If you are familiar with AT&T SVR4 Unix -- Solaris is "sort of BSD Unix" and "sort of AT&T SVR4 Unix" -- and really... no one knows what it is :-).

Solaris was primary used on "Sun Microsystems" branded workstations, servers, products, etc.

If you would prefer a more "traditional" (BSD Unix experience) - I would recommend, instead, downloading and installing one of the *BSD operating systems. I can obviously plug "FreeBSD" but there many others you can review and look at.
 
AlfredoLlaquet said:
I stopped using dark mode after I watched this video (is it trustworthy? I don't know; it just convinced me).

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HcjlZrroAs
Click to expand...
Yikes! I hadn't heard of the 'halation' effect before. Interesting. So that kind of negates the ergonomic design of terminals going back to the year dot... green and amber phosphor characters on black background. Interesting stuff. Maybe I'll give black foreground on off-white background a try.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top