The Random Thread

A question for Solaris OS experts: why isn't Oracle's Solaris popular on the desktop today?
If I only need a browser and LibreOffice, is Solaris suitable? Will I be able to update it online and through repositories?
Or are updates only available to subscribers?
And another thing that's unclear to me: why do we often avoid some corporate developments while praising other corporate developments?
For example, ZFS was also made by Sun Corporation.
Is there a lot of software in the Solaris repositories (if there are any)?
Why do I need to register to download the Solaris image?
 
This one?

Yeah
A question for Solaris OS experts: why isn't Oracle's Solaris popular on the desktop today?
A few months ago I almost went to download it, but iirc didn't like something with Wine (maybe not up-to-date? Reddit)
 
While working on this:

I've found out that the fortune command returns 1 when it finds the pattern given by the -m switch and 0 when it does not. This is backward to the standard way (0=no error) and to what the man page states.

Once I reported an error in vi in bugzilla, but the answer was that I had to report it somewhere else, so I never did, and I wouldn't do it this time either. So I won't report it. It's not so important.

This is the bug I once reported:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281638
 
I suspect that all those new data centers are at least in part needed to store the images and videos generated by the users. It's interesting to note that users have no limit on the generated images they can keep on the servers (at least in one of the leading companies). I don't know about the videos, but I guess the policy may be similar. It seems quite wasteful. I download the images of my crumbs and delete them from the server.

Anyhow, companies like YouTube have succeeded by accruing an insane amount of data, 90% of which has little or no interest for the public at large.
 
Anyhow, companies like YouTube have succeeded by accruing an insane amount of data, 90% of which has little or no interest for the public at large.

Apparently storage is relatively cheap on a datacenter scale.

And even though much content is not interesting to general human audiences you can always let an AI play with it.
 
Apparently storage is relatively cheap on a datacenter scale.

And even though much content is not interesting to general human audiences you can always let an AI play with it.

But the AI-generated contend seems to be bad to retrain AIs, because it perpetuates errors. Maybe the "data storage" part is the least important. Maybe they should call them "processing centers" or "server farms."
 
Maybe the "data storage" part is the least important. Maybe they should call them "processing centers"
yes! Storage is (and was never the issue), processing is the problem. -i.e. Storing a video for how long (when does the relevance fall)? How long does the "hamster dance" need to be stored and processed (and should it ever have been marked for storage in the first place)?
 
But the AI-generated contend seems to be bad to retrain AIs, because it perpetuates errors. Maybe the "data storage" part is the least important. Maybe they should call them "processing centers" or "server farms."

Right. I is actually a huge advantage for Google that they have a pre-AI-slop copy of the Internet. Including youtube.
 
I don't like thinking very hard. It's exhausting.
Thank you for your honesty, at least on this point. How does it come that you feel not exhausted when posting here on the FreeBSD forums in a rarely seen high frequency?
It's even more exhausting to read all that crap that obviously has been produced by little if not none at all thinking. Enduring your endless prose here is like a punishment.
 
I do know about that feature, so I'm missing part of the conversation. Anyhow the rules of the forum say that: "4. Personal attacks and profanity (in the context of an argument) are not allowed, and that includes users and developers like. Gross breaches of netiquette, like excerpting or reposting private mail when permission to do so was not and would not be forthcoming, are frowned upon but not specifically enforced. However, there are also very few cases where such content would fit within the charter of a forum and it would therefore probably rate a warning (or ban) on that basis alone."

 
Back
Top