I get that they want data on who uses their systems to better appeal to them. It should always be voluntarily. It's a big mistake, to attempt to get involuntarily information from those who are donating to them. Ask for voluntarily comments instead, asking for which goes along with their roadmap, or what they like about it, or a survey which is optional.
They need to find another way to get data, in a way which doesn't bother people. It's a mistake to not allow donators to not opt out of those questions.
Where can you find something like that?
Idk, all I have are the links, including thread, I have posted. You may have meant that rhetorically, of what you posted. It's not necessarily that. It benefit an ethnic or cultural community to have QQ messenger and have documentation for a written dialect of Chinese. The quarterly release by FreeBSD even showcased her and a Chinese community's specific efforts.
They can be kept separate, and addressed with better by the FreeBSD Foundation. The Foundation can decline which is not of their interest. Which QQ and Simplified Chinese documentation are part of FreeBSD's interests, as they have even written about. Then, dealt with inquiries better. And if it came down to a commercial deadline by another group, politely decline it, or find a way that FreeBSD benefits in return, and also, doesn't have FreeBSD take responsibility for which isn't their responsibility, such as another project's deadlines. A lot of organizations use FreeBSD, without assuming deadlines and other responsibilities onto FreeBSD.
I recall, that a FreeBSD based OS relied on FreeBSD's approval of software for its base system. One didn't make it to stable, and they mistakenly released something which wasn't vetted enough into their base system. They relied on FreeBSD for vetting it, but it didn't make it past Head branch. Was that TrueNAS? But they didn't have deadlines expected on FreeBSD. They just got ahead of themselves, and saw a software go into Head as assuming it would be ok, as it was eagerness as opposed to a pushed deadline onto another project.