I also request that.
edhunter Apr 12, 2010 #27 2 days ago switched from RELENG_8_0 (release) to RELENG_8 (stable), rebuilded world and mpd5.5. And still have problems with proxy-arp. After reading some posts on the list (http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2010-03/msg00319.html) I made some experimentings. In my system one of ethernet adapters (dedicated to lan) has ip 192.168.0.2/24. When in mpd.conf I set separate ip for the local end of vpn like this: Code: set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.200/32 ippool pool1 Proxy arp does not work. (error 256 in the log) But, when I set the ip to be the same as my ethernet adapter's one: Code: set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.2/32 ippool pool1 everything is fine! But I am not sure if this configuration (same ip for different adapters) is correct. Is it possible to expect problems?
2 days ago switched from RELENG_8_0 (release) to RELENG_8 (stable), rebuilded world and mpd5.5. And still have problems with proxy-arp. After reading some posts on the list (http://unix.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/FreeBSD/net/2010-03/msg00319.html) I made some experimentings. In my system one of ethernet adapters (dedicated to lan) has ip 192.168.0.2/24. When in mpd.conf I set separate ip for the local end of vpn like this: Code: set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.200/32 ippool pool1 Proxy arp does not work. (error 256 in the log) But, when I set the ip to be the same as my ethernet adapter's one: Code: set ipcp ranges 192.168.0.2/32 ippool pool1 everything is fine! But I am not sure if this configuration (same ip for different adapters) is correct. Is it possible to expect problems?