I need to give librewolf a try too.
Not a fan of Palemoon:
Palemoon is a Firefox fork, no? Try a different fork like Waterfox. Or ungoogled-chromium. I don't run the latter cause I build my own packages and its build time is frankly ridiculous.
let give it a try...Libre and Waterfox
And who is coding that switch in?
is like a "dejavu" ..sorry ,I quoted your post drhowarddrfine , but is like a dejavu, if they let it as a choise, well..but are changes that are implemented by brute force
I agree, but how many lines of code? If it's anything like Google's code, it's going to hurt someone's head trying to understand it.
the browser just close when enter a website, I dont remember the console message
I don't think it was this community alone, but we shall not let get that little detail in the way of celebrations.
Exactly. "You want to go to your banking website? Thanks for the credentials"
You gotta admit, this would've never happened with Google's Chrome. Chrome will do whatever they (and the corporation) will want to do.
It's at v.0.0.3
The problem is not that they are going to implement some llm in Firefox (which is already bad enough for me), the link from cracauer@ with the CEO's words is "...will evolve into a modern AI browser...". If Firefox starts developing that way, you will be able to disable options and such, but it will be optimized for using llm. It is tough to start fighting against future design. When GNU/Linux started shifting to systemd, I also wanted to think that simply not using it would be enough, but distributions and applications start adapting to having systemd, and if you do not use it, start having problems that you have to figure out how to solve. When software introduces something into its core that you do not agree with, migrate before you start getting angry. And I have mentioned Seamonkey, and other users also mentioned Librewolf and Waterfox here, and we will see how things work out, because they depend on Firefox's code, and removing options is not the same as modifying the core.
) that apply to both enterprise and consumer versions, so they likely have various AI killswitches already. Google Chrome's use in enterprise seems serious enough that Google wouldn't mess-around there (have to be competitive with Edge).What exactly are you talking about? His former addiction? "Former" is the keyword here. If anything, it shows his resilience and strength of character.
I was very interested in NetSurf... like a decade ago. It sounded promising for a while. But this isn't the late 90s/early 2000s with its text-wall websites and flashy gifs static content. Not supporting modern standards nowadays means a completely broken web. Plain and simple. Ladybird seems to support more after, what, five years of development, than Netsurf after almost two decades. Supporting modern standards never seemed to rank very high on their bucket list.
Ladybird is rapidly evolving and the FreeBSD port isn't catching up. It has no maintainer and hasn't been updated in more than a year.
This unfortunately doesn't bode well for the future of Ladybird on FreeBSD.
