I'd say : time to Netscape from thisI almost feel that's contradictory, but ironically I only found my flow disrupted on Firefox when they decided to implement that non-integrated AI summary thing![]()
I'd say : time to Netscape from thisI almost feel that's contradictory, but ironically I only found my flow disrupted on Firefox when they decided to implement that non-integrated AI summary thing![]()
I'm more likely to happily install something Poettering wrote than to use anything Google makes.use www/ungoogled-chromium to get rid of all the google-BS and data-mining in the first place
the major problem with everything this muppet comes up with: it only works on his laptop...I'm more likely to happily install something Poettering wrote than to use anything Google makes.
Is it their fault if others blindly-use it?the major problem with everything this muppet comes up with: it only works on his laptop...
And Bonzai Buddy did this same stuff and was widely considered malware. It just shows that if you pile on a dump truck of shit all at once people will notice, but if you put the steaming cow feces on, one shovelfull at a time, no-one will notice.given the corporate direction that browsers are going, I decided that when I have time (assuming I ever do have time) I'm going to download and do a clean room build of chromium, disabling anything in it that I feel facilitates data-mining.
One big one that most people are unaware of is that browsers no longer wait until you hit <ENTER> when you put in a URL or search term, as they are sending individual keystrokes to google/amazon/etc as you type. I also want the option to disable all the on-init loading of javascript infomatics that happens when you start the browser, even before you go to any site.
Bonzai Buddy was cool at the time! I wouldn't mind seeing a good-intent version of that todayAnd Bonzai Buddy did this same stuff and was widely considered malware.
You have it all wrong, friend.And Bonzai Buddy did this same stuff and was widely considered malware. It just shows that if you pile on a dump truck of shit all at once people will notice, but if you put the steaming cow feces on, one shovelfull at a time, no-one will notice.
I talk to average non-techies (as they would describe others) all the time. They don't notice. See: https://xkcd.com/2501/You have it all wrong, friend.
Everybody notices.
The secret is "put a smiley face on it and tell people they are nazi if they don't accept!"
Before they could start introducing these things in earnest, a lot of work had to be put into demolishing people's sense of private space and general decency.
The secret is: "get them to ask for the anal probe!"
Hilariously, everything that is happening now would have been a nazi's wet dream. "If we had known it could be done like this, we would not have bothered with the whole 'war' business."
Rant=off.
I was talking about spying. Not AI. AI is spyware, but I was talking about spyware in other programs.It's plastered all over everything constantly. They might as well pave the streets with "Big Brother is watching" tiles. Nobody can go five sentences without saying "AI" or some synonim.
They notice.
They don't notice it's a bad thing. Also, I'm not in the mood for a flamewar.They know that too. You think nobody noticed every ad suddenly knowing their favourite color panties?
Stop it.
They don't notice it's a bad thing.
The idea of putting internet-connected microphones and even "security" cameras in-house connected to cloud services is wild, yet everyone has em. Even the printer I have advertises cloud-connectivity for cheaper ink at a convenience
I'm not sure on my point. I avoid cloud-connected stuff on the basis of I don't want someone else spying from-afar and run self-hosted stuff to be decentralized.
Social media; people would rather use Mastodon hosted by someone else before taking a RPi and hosting their own instance that can communicate with others on decentralized protocols, as if using someone else's Mastodon instance is "better" than more-popular Facebook. Or Reddit: Lemmy is still someone else's platform.
Email I treat like a physical home address: It's not realistic to run around the world to grab your own packages, so you need to rely on someone's shipping service (USPS, UPS, FedEx, etc). Running a mail server is more effort than it's worth: I just don't use popular free ones and pay for a provider
AI I'd run on a local computer in-house, and have other devices connect to that. I'm not sure how locally-hosted AI works though, but I wonder if that would get into the mass-scraping thing that websites have Anubis trying to block?
If I install it I get something called "Nightly". Perhaps that's a development nightly build? The about->help does say waterfox though. I'll give it a spin.
Would that require frequent mass-scraping of websites to populate a useful search index? What about obscure websites? (if I heard right Google Chrome sends browsed-URLs to Google search index, but without something like that how would small or new sites get indexed?)If you are not hosting your own search engine, you are doing it wrong.
You are thinking wrong. Self-hosted meta-search engines like SearXNG still use google, brave, duckduckgo, startpage or whatever engine(s) you select in SearXNG control panel. I host it in a container that is on a completely separated network on a VLAN subnet that has no access to local network. This conainer is also connected to internet via dedicated VPN tunnel in Estonia. This way, there is no way for search engine to tie whatever it is you serach to your machine, your ip, your browser or pretty much anything. Because you are effectively not even using those engines. This would be like me calling you on your phone, and asking you to google something for me, and just tell me what the results are. The best thing about SearXNG is that you can select multiple search engines, and when you search for something, you get the result from all of them. User interface is clean, no ads, no bs, and it integrates into any browser by simply putting a search string in your browser search options. While im out of my local network, i use wireguard to connect to my opnsense instance and i have my local search engine everywhere i go. I also configured this for my entire family. They are completely unaware that they use it, and search results are always perfect. Eversince i started using it, youtube stopped bombarding me with suggestions that are based on what i searched. Best of all, its free and open source.Would that require frequent mass-scraping of websites to populate a useful search index? What about obscure websites? (if I heard right Google Chrome sends browsed-URLs to Google search index, but without something like that how would small or new sites get indexed?)