Solved Best alternative browsers for use with FreeBSD

...I do notice the Win10 version spawns a whole slew of processes
I think that's something with multi-process, but crashreporter.exe can be disabled with MOZ_CRASHREPORTER_DISABLE=1 (didn't see a separate process on FreeBSD but the env's accepted under about:support; info):
Code:
setx MOZ_CRASHREPORTER_DISABLE 1
 
Any bank should have 2FA per each payment except some trusted platforms.

Exactly. I've had 2FA on banking since 20 years ago. However it has certain contextual details

- 20 years ago it was https e-banking with physical token - my bank issued those mini-calculator-alike OTP tokens, some other banks had a fixed OTP table card issued to users. Considering that electronic token had battery issues and when battery runs out new one needs to be provisioned (going to the bank in person), the WW2 table-card approach seemed like really nice choice

- 10 years ago it was Android/iPhone m-banking for private persons and e-banking for businesses.

- Some years ago they shut off e-banking, everyone goes to m-banking.

Now the current state is very important because the bank itself shut down 2FA+web access for a unified, PIN protected, mobile application. There is no 2FA, the pin decrypts the user certificate bundle. In the case of a hack that could've been prevented by 2FA - such as a mobile platform 0day or bank app 0day, the bank gets all the blame.

However the context is important

- Physical token can be hacked. The smartcard chip in it doesn't need to be, RF transmitter can be put on its output.
- The computer or browser running web e-banking can be infected, regardless of 2FA token
- Having a 2nd mobile 2FA brings little added functionality - the second mobile can also be hacked
- The enterprises all over the world are supporting store downloaded 2FA apps for both Apple and Android, meaning they already deem the rootless smartphone as secure enough
- The "security level" will also increase by time as corporate grasp on the users tightens. It will be expected the user has a HSM chip inside a wall garden smart-device, and that applications will run on it. Ofc this has wide negative consequences on the "IT life" but it will further raise security of average device against a random hack group.

Go to the bank to do your banking perhaps?

Although I have two bank offices inside 10 minutes of walk there are many many better things to do.

I get about 5 utility bills each month, those are all city/county/state offices or enterprises.

There are many old people, pensioners in this country. The bank offices, and the kiosks on the streets that you can pay your bills in, they are for them. They don't mind chatting up the worker, they don't mind sitting for 20 minutes in air conditioned space.

It takes 1 minute to process a bill for me, from the moment I take it from the post box. Open the envelope, check the numbers, shoot it via camera inside mobile app, paid in 3 taps, write down on the bill the date of payment and slip it into the archive.

There is no old 'bill gathering' phase where you wait for every utility to arrive, and then take a bunch of bills to the bank. Bills do not have a place in my life.

It would realistically take about 30 to 45 minutes round trip time to deal anything at a bank.
It is almost 40 degrees out here with 50 real feel due to moisture.
Give me one hour and I can get to the beach and back with 30 minutes in the sea, slowly, no pressure...
There is no worse chore than having to waste time on someone else's admin, even if I lived in a middle of nowhere I would rather waste time browsing store shelves for discounts than sit at bank or any other office wating for my number to pop up.
 
I've got top notch security on my system, because I'm so broke I cannot even pay attention!
Having few FIAT money and being broke are two different things. There is no money security when the bank prints money arbitrarily and also this money can be withdrawn only when certain conditions are met. The bank can even freeze your account, as was done for example to protesting truckers in Canada, or maybe in the future if you refuse this or that demand (digital ID, biometrics, or whatever).
 
Hi,I am looking for alternatives to Firefox and Chromes that retain basic functionality when browsing a modern website while putting less pressure on CPU and GPU.Do you have any recommendations?
 
 
Sincerely, it depends on what you are trying to browse, if it's javascript heavy you are better using one of those or respective derivatives (palemoon or LibreWolf may reduce the usage but probably not by much).
On the other hand if the sites you want are not dependent on javascript you can try dillo for example (but for example this forum will be broken). Servo may be an option but I don't know about resource usage.
 
Instead of tuning on a browser level try to focus on your desktop environment whether it is running Gnome or KDE as this should have a bigger impact. For example, my legacy machine from the ancient 2009 era uses chromium that handles modern sites fine since I am running enlightenment.

I enabled policies to disable certain features that trims down the browser so this is working out for me. To have complete control you can run noscript and adblocker and this raises more time than what it may be worth in your case.

Most modern sites is optimized for chromium as that is the largest use case so you might be better off using chromium based browsers otherwise you can try falkon to test your luck.
 
Konqueror is actually pretty usable these days. I can do YouTube with it no problem. Mine is at v. 26.04.0...
And Konqueror lets you split your view as much as you want (horizontally too). ;)
Schermata_20260721_185936.png
 
I'm normally a Firefox user, but "need" to use Chromium to be able to use Spotify. On my KDE, Chromium feels a bit more responsive and alert than FF. Otherwise Kononquer seems to do a great job on weak hardware.
 
I have Librewolf working in my USB-system but I didn't do something with it. It's not bad but how does it manage passwords without some account registration? It's a Firefox fork, btw.
 
The question is do these have the ublock origin. I do not run Firefox for Firefox but because it can run a open source ad blocker.
Same. I use a static stripped profile directory including ublock and YT shorts blocker. It has no problems with this. Still, it's commercial garbage conditioned for advertising and tracking, preferably out of sight.
 
I would say LibreWolf and chromium as it's not uncommon to run into sites that lean hard into the chrome only support and try to make use of every non-standard feature that google comes up with.

Dillo is really nice for being lightweight however.

But things like youtube, are like a necessary evil in terms of them absolutely being slow resource hungry parasites on your hardware.

Honestly I hate most modern websites that down you in badly written JS with an ever expanding list of dependencies.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_browser_engines

The table lists which rendering engine is used by which browser. The choices are really quite limited.
For the original post: NetSurf does a decent job on "basic" browsing and for me, works well for forums. It has WIP javascript that, in particular does not work well with Youtube.
EngineStatusCreatorsLicenseUsed in
WebKitStableApple, initially forked from KHTMLGNU LGPL, BSD-styleSafari browser, GNOME Web, Konqueror, Orion and all browsers on App Store for iOS[3]
BlinkStableGoogle, initially forked from WebKitGNU LGPL, BSD-styleAll Chromium-based browsers
GeckoStableMozillaMozilla PublicFirefox browser and its forks; SeaMonkey browser, Thunderbird email client
GoannaStableM. C. Straver,[4] initially forked from GeckoMozilla PublicPale Moon, Basilisk, K-Meleon browsers
NetSurfStableNetSurf developers[5]GNU GPLv2NetSurf browser
 
I like the cleanliness and speed of dillo browser, and not having javascript may have hidden benefits for your time management and general wellbeing.
 
Back
Top