NomadBSD and ghostbsd, which one is better?
it may not so relate with freebsd, but i want to hear more advice as possible.
it may not so relate with freebsd, but i want to hear more advice as possible.
NomadBSD consists of 3 parts:
Each part is upgraded by another tool:
- FreeBSD base system
- 3rd Party packages (built from FreeBSD’s ports tree)
- NomadBSD-specific tools and configuration
To get a new NomadBSD version you need to write the new image to the USB drive and (re-)install on your harddrive.
- Base: freebsd-update
- Packages: pkg or Octopkg
- NomadBSD: Our updater which is not yet finished
Not found this. At least, they don't advertise about that. Had some difficulties to install it in a VirtualBox VM. I saw some problems I don't want to dig: sometimes doesn't get ip address from dhcp, not recalling the setting parameters (screen resolution).NomadBSD has an installer too, although has no updater yet (it is still in development). The main purpose for now is its portability, test & demo capability, and an ability to “try before buy”.
Not found this. At least, they don't advertise about that.
Well... If you don't know, you don't find that. I won't try this, too complicated. GhostBSD is simpler.Handbook: Installing NomadBSD on a hard disk
Start main menu → System → NomadBSD Installer and follow the instructions.
well mate is not ugly at all as you said. a ready to use DE. the issue about icons i dont have is on ghostbsd. GhostBSD is way better than nomadbsd for home usage.i tried GhostBSD
but it doesnt support zfs full disk encryption last time i checked
so not much good from a security point of view on a laptop
thats why i use Freebsd
also the desktop is really ugly
and all the icons in the status bar are massive
I think GhostBSD is the better choice for what you want. It installs a working desktop, (looks like Gnome or Mate to me) and is meant to be installed on hard disk. As has been said, it seems the purpose of Nomad is more to be a portable FreeBSD system.for office work
for more hardware
for more stable with destop status
Changing the chipset in virtualbox to ICH9 has worked for me.And, by the way, the poweroff doesn't work in efi within virtualbox as most of FreeBSd derivatives.
It's not the first time that someone advises this to properly poweroff a FreeBSD VM under VirtualBox. And, as before, this doesn't work for me (maybe because I run VirtualBox under Windows?).Changing the chipset in virtualbox to ICH9 has worked for me.
hw.efi.poweroff=0 in /etc/sysctl.conf.That's the same for me on VirtualBox under Windows 11. I enabled hyper-V, created a FreeBSD VM and it properily power off. However this is only a test, I have spent a bit to configure the FreeBSD VM under VirtualBox and stay there, but with hyper-V enabled in Windows and in the options of the VirtualBox VM, it run a bit faster (still in turtle mode but faster than before. I don't want to investigate more on this, it works and is very fast despite this).It's not the first time that someone advises this to properly poweroff a FreeBSD VM under VirtualBox. And, as before, this doesn't work for me (maybe because I run VirtualBox under Windows?).
The thing that works for me is:hw.efi.poweroff=0in /etc/sysctl.conf.
pointer = 1 2 3 4 5 0 0 0 0 0 in $home/.Xmodmap). Where you found all that kind of info? Should be better to collect all, categorize them and put in a section in the FreeBSD Handbook at the end of the chapters, for exemple troubleshootings, workaroundies, patch-it-uppies