But honestly I don't see a reason why this should be discussed here on a IT-related forum that is not dedicated to US domestic Gov matters.
Well, then, let me help You out on a reason. First and very important, this is not an US forum, it is planetscope (that includes Russia).
Second, what is "essential" for people should also not be decided solely by the US.
Another example:
My mom complains that she cannot buy the seeds to plant her food (now is the season, this cannot be done later), because government has banned the sale of gardening equip & seeds (i.e. growing the food for the next winter) as "non-essential".
They appear to have eagerly grabbed the chance to finally get rid of people growing their own food and force them to buy the monsanto-junkfood from the supermarket instead (and buy a car first to even get there and fetch the crap).
Those who are dependent on the liquor-stores are in a later stage of this same process: they have already given up on making their own schnaps, and are now slaves of the government.
What has this to do with IT? Nothing.
And, what has this to do with FreeBSD? Everything.
Because, we are in the same process: the powers-in-place do not like us. They would prefer us to throw away our computers, and buy windows computers instead, then buy some games, buy some music clips, buy some tv-on-demand, and that is all we are supposed do. And they will be looking for ways to force us to do so.
So, if you don't like discussions about politics, then at some point you may not have a cause to discuss Berkeley either, because there will be no Berkeley anymore.
I cannot see any substantial difference, between
- someone growing their own food instead of buying it from the supermarket
- someone crafting their own OS instead of buying windows
- someone distilling their own schnaps instead of buying it from the liquor-store
- someone entertaining their own thinking instead of buying pre-fabricated learning-targets from 'established' media.
The powers-in-place and the government hate all of these likewise, because this is all about the same: about DIY, about staying independent from gratification/withdrawal experiments in behaviourism.
The remaining question is: Why got we hit on short resources? Why do markets fail? Why are the huge profits from normal/peace times (in a few pockets) not a solution for suffering populations?
Sixpacks in the fridge tend to prevent thinking about such questions. Therefore alcoholic beverages for the masses are system relevant.
Indeed, these are good questions. But I don't subscribe to Your viewpoint about alcohol. It reminds me of the viewpoint of Theodor Adorno, who thought that the masses would start to think if you only make them suffer enough.
That doesn't work, it is a sadist's viewpoint. People do think when they feel a delight in thinking, just like they do gardening when they feel a delight when doing so, or hack computers because they have fun doing that, or, like my eastern friends, make their own beverages because they enjoy to do so.