Latest activity

  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Neither. Its not a distribution but an entire OS. It holds all the cards and can't be pulled around by all the little projects that make it up. However, smaller distributions (like GhostBSD) can certainly be made from it.
  • D
    homeadm Your argument is rather poor. AI (Claude) is owned by Anthropic which is a legal entity and might, one day, be sued over its AI stealing code. Of course, when one publishes their code online, they leave themselves open to theft but...
  • SirDice
    You have a translation rule somewhere, that redirects an incoming connection on $ext_if to 10.10.0.2:5101. External firewall? Are you trying to do a double NAT (or redirection) here?
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Can't see the logic of that. Which of those Gnome components need what files or devices to exist? Same for systemd. Are there any binary programs involved? I'm no linux user but what's a significant difference between linux systemd and FreeBSD...
  • SirDice
    SirDice reacted to LipkeGu's post in the thread PF NAT: Ports are not being forwarded. with Like Like.
    Im using mstsc and connect from outside to the server... clear_tmp_enable="YES" syslogd_flags="-ss" hostname="FB-FSN-FW02" keymap="de.acc.kbd" ifconfig_vtnet0="inet 10.10.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.252 up" defaultrouter="10.10.0.1"...
  • SirDice
    I would suggest putting everything in one pf.conf, at least until you figure out how the rules are processed.
  • D
    FreeBSD hasn't adopted X for that matter. It's an option, not a requirement. Wayland would be the same way. An option, not a requirement. Now, systemd is a different story.
  • SirDice
    How are you testing it?
  • SirDice
    Also, other rules are entirely skipped. rdr pass on $ext_if proto tcp from any to 1.2.3.4 port 13389 -> 192.168.10.3 port 3389 block in on $ext_if from $badguys to ($ext_if) The block rule will never get evaluated. If the pass modifier...
  • S
    scottro reacted to Charlie_'s post in the thread gitup: process_command: read failure with Thanks Thanks.
    /pkg/usr/local/etc/gitup.conf Can fetch with success from GH: "ports" : { "host" : "github.com", "repository" : "/freebsd/freebsd-ports.git", "branch" : "main"...
  • K
    kpedersen reacted to Pap's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    I beg to disagree. This reminds me the typical "use systemd or else...", which is the one and only "argument" systemd lovers have. It basically says use systemd or get a PDP-11. Even though systemd plagued the Linux world, there are systemd-free...
  • cracauer@
    cracauer@ replied to the thread Wanting to build 16-CURRENT.
    Rebooting is for wimps.
  • tembun
    tembun reacted to MG's post in the thread Boot word definition with Like Like.
    Didn't it come from Baron von Munchausen, bootstrappinhg himself out of a well?
  • Crivens
    Crivens replied to the thread Who owns the code Claude wrote?.
    What I remember from 2010, it was politicans "who are so used to lying that it is their nature".
  • SirDice
    SirDice replied to the thread Wanting to build 16-CURRENT.
    Oh, with regards to building from source (which is what you're going to need to do); https://docs.freebsd.org/en/books/handbook/cutting-edge/#makeworld And also build, src.conf and make.conf. Yes, yes, I know, pkgbase exist. But I believe it's...
  • SirDice
    There's no pass rule for port 21. Also # FTP proxy rdr on $int_if proto tcp from $int_if to any port 21 -> 127.0.0.1 port 8021 Translate traffic incoming on the $int_if with a source address of $int_if? That's exactly nothing, packets with...
  • SirDice
    SirDice replied to the thread Wanting to build 16-CURRENT.
    You should probably try to build a -STABLE version first. Get some experience. https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/topics-about-unsupported-freebsd-versions.40469/
  • C
    claudiuschan reacted to recluce's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Thanks Thanks.
    What will I do if KDE no longer supports FreeBSD, if ever? Nothing, because I don't use it. If I were using it, I would simply use one of more than a dozen other desktop environment.
  • C
    claudiuschan reacted to blackbird9's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Thanks Thanks.
    The future of freebsd, I hope, is to continue to be a free operating system, that is free as in freedom, which implies free as in zero cost, free as in free speech, and freedom from undesired content shoved in front of you like ads in the start...
  • C
    claudiuschan reacted to Alain De Vos's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Thanks Thanks.
    Time for a joke, switch to Ubuntu my friend.
  • C
    I'm an "audio man". Many dacs here. Scarlett 8i6 fails big time. [Routing problems,only windows drivers...] Scarlett 2 , ok , but no good quality. Hmmm, buzz. Must retry my Beringer U-Phoria UMC404HD. Not bad ...
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Category tree, option for private link, key exchange system, encryption layers, groups, invitation-based entry. User validation or rejection could be a democratic system to rule out abuse.
  • D
    So you only need one communication channel. Actually, more than one. One for kernel developers, one for port developers, one for users and that might be it. The rest are just idle chit chat and time wasters--like reddit.
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    We distinguish by the use of the same operating system...
  • D
    There are too many social and other media sites
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Is there any FreeBSD org community portal? I think that should be part of the future. Don't let it be mailing lists, forums and social media only. Some more encouraging communication channels would be an improvement. They could be a tiny bit...
  • D
    And no matter where you go, there you are.
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to scottro's post in the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root? with Like Like.
    I don't have an answer, but I believe the urxvt main creator is often on irc (libera chat) on a channel called, (I think) #urxvt. I haven't been, but a friend used to go there frequently, and I believe they would respond reasonably quickly. I...
  • S
    scottro replied to the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root?.
    I don't have an answer, but I believe the urxvt main creator is often on irc (libera chat) on a channel called, (I think) #urxvt. I haven't been, but a friend used to go there frequently, and I believe they would respond reasonably quickly. I...
  • Jose
    Jose posted the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root? in General.
    I just started using urxvtd and noticed that if I add it to my .xinitrc it spawns two processes, one as my user and another as root. Anyone know why? Seems like an unnecessary security risk.
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    :) I linked that 'cause it has the eye candy. There's plenty of source in other sub-projects: https://github.com/gershwin-desktop
  • freethread
    freethread reacted to Ilovehotdog's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Put in another hour, but finally—Chinese input is working, and I got the right sound channel set as the default. For now, I’ll just stick with GhostBSD and wait for FreeBSD 15.1, or 16, maybe even 17... whenever it actually starts to feel right...
  • freethread
    freethread reacted to BigSneakyDuck's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    A lot of people genuinely enjoy working on UI. They're often people with a different skill set to those who work on WiFi drivers anyway - in fact the ability to hack WiFi drivers plus access to suitable hardware for testing is very much a...
  • K
    A disturbing theme in this thread is that lack of hardware support is a conscious choice. It most certainly is not. Hardware support requires component manufacturers to disclose their product control API, which most do not, unless licensee is...
  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Indeed. To clarify, the conscious choice is not to specifically lack certain hardware support; but instead to not compromise the platform by bending over backwards for ridiculous hardware vendors. Not when there is so much choice of better...
  • K
    kpedersen reacted to mer's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    I had an original Mac (the beige box with the 9inch B&W screen) then a couple iterations of macOS. The biggest draw was consistency. Applications were consistent. Window decorations, open/close/minimize etc. Up through I think the 2009...
  • F
    feld replied to the thread opencode.ai.
    In lieu of OpenCode, I will say that emacs with gptel + gptel-agent works pretty well and can connect to basically any LLM API and handle tool calling, etc. It's going to be significantly more lightweight too. There are some things I like better...
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to recluce's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    What will I do if KDE no longer supports FreeBSD, if ever? Nothing, because I don't use it. If I were using it, I would simply use one of more than a dozen other desktop environment.
  • R
    Not a very useful discussion, in my mind. With all electronics, I expect the bathtub curve: High failure rate in infancy that rapidly drops off Flat, very low failure rate for the useful life of a system/component Increasing failure rate towards...
  • R
    recluce replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    What will I do if KDE no longer supports FreeBSD, if ever? Nothing, because I don't use it. If I were using it, I would simply use one of more than a dozen other desktop environment.
  • geobarrod
    geobarrod replied to the thread Net autotuner.
    The Network Autotuner was conceived as a mechanism for dynamic adjustment of kernel networking parameters in real time, particularly under high network load conditions where static sysctl values are insufficient. Primary purpose: • Monitor live...
  • R
    recluce reacted to cracauer@'s post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    This is just another doom thread based on a premise that to my knowledge is not true. Can you link to a statement where KDE says they will not support FreeBSD anymore? (and not their stupid display manager that is systemd integrated, I don't use...
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    I think you mean it needs root to build. All desktops need root to install.
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Maybe here? https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gershwin-desktop-environments.101213/
  • S
    sprock replied to the thread protonmail bridge.
    I installed mail/hydroxide but it does not work: sudo service hydroxide oneinit Enter mail account id:fred@proton.me Password: 2026/05/07 16:34:27 request failed: POST https://mail.proton.me/api/auth: [9001] For security reasons, please complete...
  • cracauer@
    OK, so I got a brand new pair of beyerdynamic DT 990's and have been burning in the Aune dac with 24-hour a day playing the lofi live stream. It's gotten really nice now, I'm pretty sure the one I have doesn't have fake op-amps. I'm going to...
  • cracauer@
    cracauer@ replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    I don't know much about the general UI on macOS, I only use the window manager. And that one sucks.
  • S
    I'm also having the issue
  • SirDice
    Security updates have been merged to the quarterly branch, but the builds there haven't been done yet.
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to kpedersen's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Nice. That is shaping up quite well. I particularly like their policies of not spraying 3rd party programs all over the UNIX filesystem. Weirdly I was never into the Mac OS X interface, I found it a bit clunky but at this point, anything from...
Back
Top