Latest activity

  • C
    I'm an "audio man". Many dacs here. Scarlett 8i6 fails big time. [Routing problems,only windows drivers...] Scarlett 2 , ok , but no good quality. Hmmm, buzz. Must retry my Beringer U-Phoria UMC404HD. Not bad ...
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Category tree, option for private link, key exchange system, encryption layers, groups, invitation-based entry. User validation or rejection could be a democratic system to rule out abuse.
  • D
    So you only need one communication channel. Actually, more than one. One for kernel developers, one for port developers, one for users and that might be it. The rest are just idle chit chat and time wasters--like reddit.
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    We distinguish by the use of the same operating system...
  • D
    There are too many social and other media sites
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Is there any FreeBSD org community portal? I think that should be part of the future. Don't let it be mailing lists, forums and social media only. Some more encouraging communication channels would be an improvement. They could be a tiny bit...
  • D
    And no matter where you go, there you are.
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to scottro's post in the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root? with Like Like.
    I don't have an answer, but I believe the urxvt main creator is often on irc (libera chat) on a channel called, (I think) #urxvt. I haven't been, but a friend used to go there frequently, and I believe they would respond reasonably quickly. I...
  • S
    scottro replied to the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root?.
    I don't have an answer, but I believe the urxvt main creator is often on irc (libera chat) on a channel called, (I think) #urxvt. I haven't been, but a friend used to go there frequently, and I believe they would respond reasonably quickly. I...
  • Jose
    Jose posted the thread Why is urxvtd(1) suid root? in General.
    I just started using urxvtd and noticed that if I add it to my .xinitrc it spawns two processes, one as my user and another as root. Anyone know why? Seems like an unnecessary security risk.
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    :) I linked that 'cause it has the eye candy. There's plenty of source in other sub-projects: https://github.com/gershwin-desktop
  • freethread
    freethread reacted to Ilovehotdog's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Put in another hour, but finally—Chinese input is working, and I got the right sound channel set as the default. For now, I’ll just stick with GhostBSD and wait for FreeBSD 15.1, or 16, maybe even 17... whenever it actually starts to feel right...
  • freethread
    freethread reacted to BigSneakyDuck's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    A lot of people genuinely enjoy working on UI. They're often people with a different skill set to those who work on WiFi drivers anyway - in fact the ability to hack WiFi drivers plus access to suitable hardware for testing is very much a...
  • K
    A disturbing theme in this thread is that lack of hardware support is a conscious choice. It most certainly is not. Hardware support requires component manufacturers to disclose their product control API, which most do not, unless licensee is...
  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Indeed. To clarify, the conscious choice is not to specifically lack certain hardware support; but instead to not compromise the platform by bending over backwards for ridiculous hardware vendors. Not when there is so much choice of better...
  • K
    kpedersen reacted to mer's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    I had an original Mac (the beige box with the 9inch B&W screen) then a couple iterations of macOS. The biggest draw was consistency. Applications were consistent. Window decorations, open/close/minimize etc. Up through I think the 2009...
  • F
    feld replied to the thread opencode.ai.
    In lieu of OpenCode, I will say that emacs with gptel + gptel-agent works pretty well and can connect to basically any LLM API and handle tool calling, etc. It's going to be significantly more lightweight too. There are some things I like better...
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to recluce's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    What will I do if KDE no longer supports FreeBSD, if ever? Nothing, because I don't use it. If I were using it, I would simply use one of more than a dozen other desktop environment.
  • R
    Not a very useful discussion, in my mind. With all electronics, I expect the bathtub curve: High failure rate in infancy that rapidly drops off Flat, very low failure rate for the useful life of a system/component Increasing failure rate towards...
  • R
    recluce replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    What will I do if KDE no longer supports FreeBSD, if ever? Nothing, because I don't use it. If I were using it, I would simply use one of more than a dozen other desktop environment.
  • geobarrod
    geobarrod replied to the thread Net autotuner.
    The Network Autotuner was conceived as a mechanism for dynamic adjustment of kernel networking parameters in real time, particularly under high network load conditions where static sysctl values are insufficient. Primary purpose: • Monitor live...
  • R
    recluce reacted to cracauer@'s post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    This is just another doom thread based on a premise that to my knowledge is not true. Can you link to a statement where KDE says they will not support FreeBSD anymore? (and not their stupid display manager that is systemd integrated, I don't use...
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    I think you mean it needs root to build. All desktops need root to install.
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Maybe here? https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/gershwin-desktop-environments.101213/
  • S
    sprock replied to the thread protonmail bridge.
    I installed mail/hydroxide but it does not work: sudo service hydroxide oneinit Enter mail account id:fred@proton.me Password: 2026/05/07 16:34:27 request failed: POST https://mail.proton.me/api/auth: [9001] For security reasons, please complete...
  • cracauer@
    OK, so I got a brand new pair of beyerdynamic DT 990's and have been burning in the Aune dac with 24-hour a day playing the lofi live stream. It's gotten really nice now, I'm pretty sure the one I have doesn't have fake op-amps. I'm going to...
  • cracauer@
    cracauer@ replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    I don't know much about the general UI on macOS, I only use the window manager. And that one sucks.
  • S
    I'm also having the issue
  • SirDice
    Security updates have been merged to the quarterly branch, but the builds there haven't been done yet.
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to kpedersen's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Nice. That is shaping up quite well. I particularly like their policies of not spraying 3rd party programs all over the UNIX filesystem. Weirdly I was never into the Mac OS X interface, I found it a bit clunky but at this point, anything from...
  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Nice. That is shaping up quite well. I particularly like their policies of not spraying 3rd party programs all over the UNIX filesystem. Weirdly I was never into the Mac OS X interface, I found it a bit clunky but at this point, anything from...
  • K
    kpedersen reacted to Jose's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Well, proprietary user interfaces have been steadily enshitificated for about a decade now. I think this is because UI peaked around 2009, but product managers and UI designers still gotta make a living. They've been pushing net-negative changes...
  • Jose
    Hahaha
  • Jose
    Jose replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Well, proprietary user interfaces have been steadily enshitificated for about a decade now. I think this is because UI peaked around 2009, but product managers and UI designers still gotta make a living. They've been pushing net-negative changes...
  • Jose
    Jose reacted to kpedersen's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Indeed, Bluetooth and Nvidia support are conscious choices. Some examples where OpenBSD's efforts have yielded better results include Wifi on Raspberry Pi 3 (bwfm(4)) and support for recent Intel wifi (i.e iwx(4)) before FreeBSD got their Linux...
  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Indeed, Bluetooth and Nvidia support are conscious choices. Some examples where OpenBSD's efforts have yielded better results include Wifi on Raspberry Pi 3 (bwfm(4)) and support for recent Intel wifi (i.e iwx(4)) before FreeBSD got their Linux...
  • S
    scottro replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Assuming (and as the joke goes, when you assume, you make an ass of you and me), that Chinese input works similarly to Japanese input, there are several Wayland window managers that use it. I've used Japanese (with fcitx5) in labwc, sway, and...
  • M
    Michael-O replied to the thread Quare FreeBSD?.
    It shall not:
  • H
    hedwards replied to the thread Who owns the code Claude wrote?.
    Yes, IIRC, it came up in 2010 and HAL stands for Heuristic ALgorithmics, and definitely not to be one letter before IBM. So, presumably, what it was doing was more of an identifying what sort of a problem it was dealing with and then using a set...
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread Boot word definition.
    What I mean is that the actual hardware requirements to make a PC start up is less than 1% of the constructs that modern boards have. It needs the initial data in memory, that's it. Software can do the rest. Everything that can be changed is...
  • SirDice
    What version? And when, exactly, does this option appear? "During installation" is a bit broad.
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread Boot word definition.
    It was an imulsive reply. For PC's, I think most of it is unnecessary. The industry wants software to be hardware to keep control above the operator. After hardware POST, what's needed more of hard static procedures than copying a blob of...
  • SirDice
    It won't. It's a minor version change, ABI is kept stable across the entire major branch. So it's not a problem to run an application that was built on/for 14.0 on 14.4.
  • D
    drhowarddrfine reacted to kpedersen's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    Unfortunately, compared to writing wifi drivers, people think UI and usability is "easy" because they believe they understand it based on their own personal experiences and biases. Technically drawing glorified boxes is easy, so it opens the...
  • K
    kpedersen reacted to T-Aoki's post in the thread What is the future of FreeBSD? with Like Like.
    And maybe why GUI toolkits are relatively limited while desktop environments / window managers / compositors are much more, too.
  • MG
    MG replied to the thread Boot word definition.
    Didn't it come from Baron von Munchausen, bootstrappinhg himself out of a well?
  • SirDice
    Should only happen with a major version upgrade. The ABI is only allowed to change between major versions. This ABI is the reason you need to recompile your applications, they need to be linked to the "new" libc for example.
  • K
    kpedersen replied to the thread What is the future of FreeBSD?.
    Unfortunately, compared to writing wifi drivers, people think UI and usability is "easy" because they believe they understand it based on their own personal experiences and biases. Technically drawing glorified boxes is easy, so it opens the...
  • SirDice
    SirDice replied to the thread Boot word definition.
    Yes, no, a bit. Depends on the context really (which point of view, the computer or the OS). Boot process from the system's point of view, the system powering on, do its POST, find attached disks, and depending on the type of boot (UEFI/BIOS) it...
  • SirDice
    Nope. Your running and installed kernel are both p3, your userland is p4. The order of the output is always the same regardless of the order of the options. If several of the above options are specified, freebsd-version will print the...
Back
Top