No.will freebsd12 support ZFS native encryption
if so, it means that the linux layer will be more powerful, but i did not see much improvment of linux compatible layer.No.
ZFS - FreeBSD moving to ZFS-on-Linux
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2018-December/027085.html Looks like FreeBSD is going to be re-basing ZFS on the Linux port. The original port was based on OpenSolaris/Illumos which then moved to DelphixOS. However, Delphix have now announced they are moving to the Linux port...forums.freebsd.org
What do you mean ? ZoL supports native encryption https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/pull/5769/commits/5aef9bedc801830264428c64cd2242d1b786fd49No.
ZFS - FreeBSD moving to ZFS-on-Linux
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-fs/2018-December/027085.html Looks like FreeBSD is going to be re-basing ZFS on the Linux port. The original port was based on OpenSolaris/Illumos which then moved to DelphixOS. However, Delphix have now announced they are moving to the Linux port...forums.freebsd.org
The question was "Will FreeBSD 12...". So I think the "No" refers to that version of FreeBSD.no doubts, we'll get native encryption after transition to ZoL/F.
The transition to ZoL will add it but it's going to be 13.0 at the earliest and perhaps even later.It worked, so, no doubts, we'll get native encryption after transition to ZoL/F.
I believe we can try ZoF on FreeBSD 12 already.
[ports] Contents of /head/sysutils/zol-kmod/Makefile
svnweb.freebsd.org
- Allow building ZoL on 12-STABLE after 1200504
I believe we can try ZoF on FreeBSD 12 already.
[ports] Contents of /head/sysutils/zol-kmod/Makefile
svnweb.freebsd.org
i have find the 'zol' and 'zol-kmod' in ports list, in my laptop freebsd ports tree, i did not find this, i just search zol on 'freebsd.org'I believe we can try ZoF on FreeBSD 12 already.
[ports] Contents of /head/sysutils/zol-kmod/Makefile
svnweb.freebsd.org
by the way, the android develop tools, is really hard to made, and some java app runs bad, failed to fire up linux-javaI believe we can try ZoF on FreeBSD 12 already.
[ports] Contents of /head/sysutils/zol-kmod/Makefile
svnweb.freebsd.org
I believe we can try ZoF on FreeBSD 12 already.
[ports] Contents of /head/sysutils/zol-kmod/Makefile
svnweb.freebsd.org
wish you have a backupI already had a nightmare about backuping and transfering files from geli encryption disks to zfs native encryption disks.
What about geli? Will it continue to be a valid alternative, won't it?
when will 12-stable come?FreeBSD 12-STABLE after AES-CCM support was added, not FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE. Small, but important, difference/clarification.
From the Makefile commit logs:
when will 12-stable come?
23.4.2. Using FreeBSD-STABLEwhen will 12-stable come?
What about geli? Will it continue to be a valid alternative, won't it?
just as an info for you: I did a performance test on a current Ubuntu Linux with ZFS 0.8.3. I used fio to compare native ZFS, encrypted ZFS and LUKS-encrypted partition as a backing device for unencrypted ZFS - all on a notebook with ssd. LUKS-encrypted (equivalent to what we in FreeBSD land have with geli) was 2-6 times faster than encrypted zfs... most of the times 4x - I did not expect the difference to be that huge.
yes. So unless you have a special need for encrypted zfs I highly recommend geli (FreeBSD) or luks (Linux).So what you're saying is that encrypted ZFS is slow AF ?
yes. So unless you have a special need for encrypted zfs I highly recommend geli (FreeBSD) or luks (Linux).