usbdetach Today at 3:55 PM #1 Today it might make sense with all the work on pkg-base even before pkg-base, I would see pkg upgrade itself almost every time I ran pkg upgrade. What's going on here? Why is pkg(8) so maintenance intensive?
Today it might make sense with all the work on pkg-base even before pkg-base, I would see pkg upgrade itself almost every time I ran pkg upgrade. What's going on here? Why is pkg(8) so maintenance intensive?
Emrion Today at 6:03 PM #2 It's in intensive development since some years. You can see it here: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg What is the purpose of such a queston?
It's in intensive development since some years. You can see it here: https://github.com/freebsd/pkg What is the purpose of such a queston?
MG Today at 6:26 PM #3 It's absolutely a supply-chain attack target. Everyday someone is trying to spread malicious code through this default portal. I wonder if it also interchanges the executable fingerprint with rhe official binary suppliers to catch systems with a suspicious client.
It's absolutely a supply-chain attack target. Everyday someone is trying to spread malicious code through this default portal. I wonder if it also interchanges the executable fingerprint with rhe official binary suppliers to catch systems with a suspicious client.
