Maybe a missing dependency. It builds succesfully anyway and it doesn't talk about any problems in the console output, apart from the common useless information overload.
JavaScript error: https://forums.freebsd.org/js/freebsd/freebsd-forums-mobile-layout-fixer-xf2.min.js?_v=91b29b3a, line 1: ReferenceError: jQuery is not definedIt would be up to technical users / developers to lead the way.It's a shame we can't fix:
DOS 6.11 and Windows 3.11 with Netscape....
I found and tossed some HTML tags around for a basic status page!
Now at 147.0.4,2 pkg version. This is my mess-around computer
It was just an example of firefox output that I saw while using it, while there's no problem, and it doesn't show any related program component. Can we have a function name or line number? This is fake open source, in my opinion. Everything is garbled to an uncomprehensible mass of code to prevent modification. If you want something to be different, use an extension that's mostly approved unsafe.
I do a lot of my browsing with elinks (with js and cookies disabled, spoofed user agent, non inlined CSS disabled, and some CSS rules forced to harmonize everything, like headers colors), and you can get surprisingly far with that, provided you just want to read, and not to interact. Typically, you don't have access to the "webapp" style of websites, but all those who want their content to be seen by search engines work quite well on text browsers (depending on your personal level of "good enough" when it comes to presentation, of course ; but personally, I call a win reading all pages in the same font in my terminal without any distraction). The irony: it's not using a commonplace user agent that breaks it the most, by triggering captchas.
Mosaic was my browser of choice, back_then_when.. It ran (then) in ANY OSIt's a shame we can't fix:
DOS 6.11 and Windows 3.11 with Netscape....
I think that it means that whatever is to follow is not mediocre. Either it's above average by a significant margin or below average by a significant margin. I'd wager that it's probably somewhat more likely to be above average than below, but that's purely speculation.
I partially turn on AI blinders if I detect too much initial fluffI think that it means that whatever is to follow is not mediocre. Either it's above average by a significant margin or below average by a significant margin. I'd wager that it's probably somewhat more likely to be above average than below, but that's purely speculation.
My question is why websites even need to know which operating system the user is using.
It could make sense if the site sillily requires specific plugins / extensions that are (unfortunately / sillily) provided for quite limited OS'es / versions only but there are no way to determine the plugins / extensions are installed or not.
What mainstream websites today do something that wild?
(for-profits might benefit from allowing users who know what they're doing non-Windows before blocking profits trying to cater to non-technical while somehow entertaining a non-friendly website )Would be DRM (Digital Rights Management) things.What mainstream websites today do something that wild?
I'd figure if it's Flash player; if the plugin doesn't exist you just don't see the window (can have a plaintext link leading to a help page), and anyone not using Windows can probably figure something out technical
Yeah I'd expect it from mainstream video streaming services, but what are other websites doing? I think it's more than bank websites doing it and their "regulations", but I'd figure in bank's cases they should appreciate me using a more secure OS than some generic maybe-outdated Windows
It's not necessarily that they care about the OS, but they only actively support certain configurations.
It's not necessarily that they will block FreeBSD. They will give you a degraded experience because they're not doing more work to figure out the exact capabilities of your browser. Examples are many consumer IoT devices, routers, and even some mainstream news outlets like The Chicago Tribune.
