What apps can make a poster?

Supposing they just need to be printed (the size seems so.) We may later look for an electronics form (e.g. concatenate them to one PDF-file as an handout.)

You see, you need to fit a rectangle into a rectangle, which better should both have the same aspect ratio.
The outmost rectangle is your sheet of paper, the inner one your picture, while the margin, the not printed area between picture and paper's edges, have to be the same width at all four sides - not too narrow, not too wide - to get a good impression.
This margin consists in fact of two kind of margins: The margin you add/adjust to your picture by resizing it, and the technically margin the printer/plotter produces, which alas is not only unavoidable, but also unequal.
(Almost) every real printer/plotter always delivers a technically unavoidable margin - an area of paper not printable. Mostly top and bottom margins are narrow, while left and right margins are significantly broader. So you need to do some calculations (a + b, duh!) to know how much margin you need to add, to get the right amount of margin. For that you need of course to know the margin the printer produces. This you can get either from the technical documentation of the according printer/plotter, or print a full sided testpage, and just measure it.

That's what you always do on any printjob:
Always do a single page test print, before your start the whole print job. (And on this job you will do some until the result will fit your expectations - that's why I take my time to give you some of my experiences. 😁:cool:)

Anyway it's almost certain you need to cut at least two sides of the paper afterwards to make the paper fit the printed image. (Not with scissors, of course; those produce ugly edges.)

Anyway I recommend to avoid any background patterns/graphics/watermarks, at least for the printed version. Those produce lots of trouble, and at the end only lower the quality of the printed matters, only.

So, now to the main, and maybe only point you can adjust: The resizing of the picture.
There are two ways: Keeping the aspect ratio, or not keeping it.
You see resizing a picture by 50% produces a picture half the size while keeping the aspect ratio.
Resizing a 4000 x 3000 pixels or a 40cm x 30cm picture to 20m x 12 cm, or 2000 x 1200 pixels makes it even smaller than 50%, but the aspect ratio is not kept, which means the picture will be distorted.
Depending on the kind of picture a bit distortion (app. ~ 5..10%) may not stick out, and is tolerated by the viewer. So that gives you a bit clearance for adusting the picture's size to fit into the margin.
If no distortion is allowed at all (any graphs must stay true to scale), then you have to keep the aspect ratio.

Supposing all pictures you need to print have the same size, the same aspect ratio, same resolution, you pick one (at best the one with most smallest details (graphics/fonts) later need to be distinguished.)
Load it into your favorite graphics program (e.g. Gimp), and see what size it currently is (of course, you work on copies of the files - needless to say) and how much percentage you need to resize it to fit the targeted paper size (percentage, pixels, better mm, with keeping aspect ratio, or not.)

You can do it all in Gimp (or another painting program capable for the job), but depending on the amount of pictures that's an effort can be spared by using a computer a computer is for: automate it. If not done already install ImageMagick.
This way you can use its tools for doing the jobs needed to be done finally for all pictures automatically with a small script: potentially turn them by 90° to fit landscape onto portrait paper sheet, resize them to the new format you figured out manually once, and convert them into a file format you can deliver to your printer (Postscript, PDF, whatever the printer/plotter wants.)
 
Yeah, when it comes to prepping a poster for actual printing, it helps to know the actual size (and type) of the paper the poster will be printed on. And PowerPoint actually does a decent job of that, it gives you a decent preview of what it will look like. Hell, at my university, we had an HP printer that could print a poster that is 1.5 m (150 cm) wide. Dunno what OP (or OP's advisor) has access to.

I have seen people put in a lot of work into resizing a picture so that it looks good on a PowerPoint slide along other content. And sometimes, lo-res, blocky figures do a better job communicating than a hi-res photo. And lo-res, blocky figures can end up being easier to save, specify, and print.

And sometimes, all it takes is figuring out what OP has access to, then sitting down and actually doing it. It very well can take several drafts before OP is ready to print it. And I think that's OK, preparing drafts that need to be edited - that is part of the workflow.
 
I used PowerPoint (or LibreOffice Impress) a lot for teaching, so I'm used to it. For a poster like you're showing, you can just define a slide size of 40" X 30" or whatever your needed size is, then paste in text blocks and graphics as desired.

Just one thing, no matter how you make your poster: please Please PLEASE up your font sizes enough that the crowd member two shoulders back can still read at least your major points. Your examples above fail this point, as so many do --- the judges may be willing to elbow up and read the little print, but the casual viewers may just give up and move on to the next poster. Font sizes of 48pt and bigger are your Friend.
 
Electronic Handout

Supposing the images all have the same size and the same aspect ratio, and all needs to be done is only to attach them together as one PDF file. So there is no editing to make, no texts nor symbols to be added, just as they are.
Then I wouldn't do that with some publisher (Impress, PowerPoint, etc.) It's too much effort, too much fumbling - you need to create an extra blank sheet for each page, load each image into the editor, place and resize it manually until it fits, and then print it to PDF what at the end delivers a way too large file, because all those Office progs produce a lot of data overhead (mostly XML dialects, plus other stuff) that in this case is just empty weight. So eventually you need to resize the whole shebang anyway, because letting a 20...30 pages PDF file with >200MB into the wild, or even hand it to your customers/clients is ... not handsome.

Just simply reduce them to a comfortable size to fit common screens (somewhere around 1920 x 1200 was good, because not everybody has a 5120 x 1440 monitor - especially not laptop users), then convert them to PDF.
Again with ImageMagick's convert(1) function this can be automated with a simple, tiny sh script.
Then you can use e.g. /print/pdftk to concatenate them all to one PDF file.
 
The problem is, that we still do not know exactly what is the problem the OP wants to solve.
The OP gave an example, but is that the to print them or to create something similar to them?
Now, we know that it is not about a presentation with Beamer, but real poster. That is why I pointed to DTP software.
to create something like them.
Now I'm doing it by gimp
 
to create something like them.
Now I'm doing it by gimp
I hope you are successful.

I do not use or know gimp, but as far as I know, it is for manipulating images and hence not the right tool, because you need to embed text.

Note that gimp is not listed in the list of DTP programs.
I would in your case perhaps use one of the list that other people here recommended, namely lyx, scribus, libreoffice.
For what I read in WWW, probably scribus is the best option.
Programs like gimp, ImageMagick, netpbn only auxiliary, to prepare images.
I also do not know these programs, I use TeX for such things, also not 100% the right tool,
and it is a headache if you must have it done fast and do not have experience with it.
 
The problem is, that we still do not know exactly what is the problem the OP wants to solve.
Yepp.
Definition of the task.
"How to make a beverage?"
"...depends - coffee, beer, wine, lemonade, whiskey, milk shake...? one liter, 100k liter per year, just for yourself or on a commercial level?....??"
That's exactly why engineers ask back so much: They want to help, start by helping to define the problem right, so to deliver not only a useful, but also the wanted solution. For that it needs to be known what is wanted.
If it's either too much to ask for a clear definition, or overchallenging to get there together, well, then "drink water!" 😁

Now I'm doing it by gimp
it is for manipulating images and hence not the right tool
You can do it with Gimp. But that's a lot of effort, kind of from behind through the knee into the eye. 😁:cool:
If it is what I said in my last post, just concatenate them into one single PDF I would have done the job in under half an hour in the way I described. 😁 :cool:
But such jobs always also have to fit a time schedule, so when there are no basics in shell scripting, no time to install a few packages and not a bit time to read their man pages, so to get the job done (way) quicker, then you stick with the tools you know, even if then it was five or more times the work.🥸
That's why I said:
So, you better use well versed jobs as a chance to learn new tools, to enlarge your toolbox.

I wish you also to get a satisfying result in time.
 
Like Maturin pointed out - not impossible, but an awful lot of effort to get right if you stick with GIMP. I'd suggest the KISS principle - to keep it simple.

GIMP is a useful tool to know, but if you spend too much time with it, it's probably not the right tool for the job.
Ok, I'm learning scribus now
 
Ok, I'm learning scribus now
Very good.
That's at least anyway more efficient than using Gimp on this job. 👍

When you will have some time, try to give ImageMagick's convert a closer look, and learn at least the rudimentary basics of shell scripting.
Promised: It's valuable invested time for any next job similar like that. 🤓
 
Since your professor already seems to have JPGs, Annalesa, you're halfway home. Get the original art from your professor, in SVG format if you can because it enlarges better, and take it over to your university's print shop or publications office (whatever it may be called).

Tell them that you need 5 (or however many) copies of each of the images enlarged, in color, to X by Y, printed on poster stock. EDIT: I'm presuming you're going to have these posters on an easel so that you can point to them as you give your presentation.

The people who do publications do this sort of thing all the time, so they'll completely understand what you need. You should have a billing number from your or your professor's office budget because the pubs people will ask you for that (they don't work for free for anyone). If you don't have a budget number, see whether the pubs people will phone and get one from the department's admin staff. If you can't do that either, you'll have to pay in cash and then get reimbursed - but try to avoid that since you might graduate before the money will be back in your pocket.

 
I installed scribus. It is a package bloat that bring more package bloat.

Big latence, takes time to start.

Error with loader, right mouse context menu disappears short after clicking.

It actualized my firefox, an I had to reconfigure firefox, a headache.

It seems it is a typical bloat to be run with a "desktop envirenment". like gnome.

I think the task could be solved much easier programming a little postscript to make frames and embed
in them external image and eps files. Perhaps to write a program for that purpose is not difficult for someone
that knows well postscript.
 
Good luck Annalesa . If Scribus turns out to be more difficult to learn/work with than it should be, LibreOffice Impress or PowerPoint are more intuitive and straight forward in my experience, as previously suggested. Good luck! You know you will need a plotter to print your poster, right?
 
Back
Top