Hi,
I have a FreeBSD 12.0 machine where I was obliged to apply a diff patch on a kernel source (PR 229852). I used svnlite just two months ago, applied the patch, compiled and installed the kernel. So far, so good (Revision: 345996).
I didn't patch the system (no -p4 or -p5) because I would have to recompile and reinstall kernel & world (too long).
But now
For another machine with 12.0-RELEASE but patched p4/p5, the upgrade went (samba47-4.7.12_1).
So I think the FreeBSD version is the problem. Shall I have to recompile all for each patch if I want to set the packages up to date?
Seems strange to me. Packages shouldn't consider the patch level, no?
I have a FreeBSD 12.0 machine where I was obliged to apply a diff patch on a kernel source (PR 229852). I used svnlite just two months ago, applied the patch, compiled and installed the kernel. So far, so good (Revision: 345996).
I didn't patch the system (no -p4 or -p5) because I would have to recompile and reinstall kernel & world (too long).
But now
pkg audit
reports a vulnerability on samba47. And pkg upgrade samba47
returns that my package is up to date.For another machine with 12.0-RELEASE but patched p4/p5, the upgrade went (samba47-4.7.12_1).
So I think the FreeBSD version is the problem. Shall I have to recompile all for each patch if I want to set the packages up to date?
Seems strange to me. Packages shouldn't consider the patch level, no?