Please beware of www.freebsdsoftware.org - it contains AI slop

C

Corwynt

Just want to make FreeBSD users aware: The site www.freebsdsoftware.org has a lot of "plausible-looking" information, but most of it is completely wrong. It seems to be an AI slop site.

For example: hxxp://www.freebsdsoftware.org/blog/freebsd-gaming-2026.html

it says to "pkg install dxvk". There is no such package. There is also no package called "mesa-mesa-vulkan-intel".

The site is pure slop. Sadly, search results put it above the FreeBSD Handbook. Please make sure you get your documentation from the proper places.
 
Site has been linked before on the forums. I've gone through a couple now and intentionally broke those links. It's been around for quite some time, the domain was created in 1985. No activity in the wayback machine before 2004.
 
Corwynt said:
Domain was registered in 2004. Not sure where you get 1985 from?
Click to expand...
Oops. That was the creation date of the registrar 🤦‍♂️

Anyway, gone through a bunch of old posts, if it was a reference to a port, replaced it with our regular [port]....[/port], if it was a blog post, broke the link http -> httpx.
 
Unrelated but thought I'd post it here.
I have a 8ft by 14ft garden area in my backyard. Never had luck planting anything there so, just to try it, I asked chatgpt to give me some planting ideas along with an image. In my original question I told it there was full sun in the afternoon but then modified it to allow for the rabbits and squirrels chewing on everything.

Chatgpt forgot some parts in the original question. I went to a local nursery that offered a free design service and showed them the plants and layout. "Uh," she said. "You realize this is way too crowded and two of these are shade only plants?"
 
Came across some explanation while editing an old post (~2009), didn't pay much attention to it hunting for the links. Now I can't find that post anymore. Will try to dig it up again.

Edit: Scratch that. No explanation, site reportedly crashed Firefox at some point in time. Malware on the site was suspected but never found. No idea who created it or for what reason. Did consistently show old and outdated ports information (wayback machine). Still does (their ports information is at least a couple of months behind).
 
Alain De Vos said:
I have totally no problems sites using AI.
Click to expand...
I'm ok with 'using' LLMs for certain tasks. For example grammar and other suggestions for the author. (Despte it paying directly into the pockets of American fascism...)

But generating all the content with LLMs entirely is despicable. The information is completely unreliable and all that person did was waste tons of energy and learning exactly NOTHING while doing so.

EDIT: The website in questions here is clearly completely generated. With cross references and sections that make no sense. Even the CSS/Styling is obviously the first one that the LLM came up with. They all look like that. Whoever put his nonsense online is a complete waste of oxygen.
 
Looks like text content that's a random selection already puublic content.
Who's going to scroll through it all?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top