ReactOS looks like an interesting project.
Threat to Windows? No. Never. As an architect responsible for supervising a fairly large MS development team I'd submit that the slew technologies released by MS in last 2-3 years has changed the rules.
Competing with Windows at OS level this point is useless. Its like saying I've designed a better chasiss than top 5 car makers. Sorry but customers don't buy chasiss, they buy cars.
However, I'll be most interested in knowing what kind of graphical interface system ReactOS has implemented. If it is functional enough and portable than I'll be ready take a stab at porting it to FreeBSD. But, at this point FreeBSD isn't ready (no framebuffer device??).
I think the lasting contribution of the ReactOS poroject might be a workable X11 alternative as a takeaway. If it works than it would have succeded in what Linux tried to do and failed i.e. open source desktop. API compatibility with Windows will also ensure porting of Windows apps fairly rapidly.
Threat to Windows? No. Never. As an architect responsible for supervising a fairly large MS development team I'd submit that the slew technologies released by MS in last 2-3 years has changed the rules.
Competing with Windows at OS level this point is useless. Its like saying I've designed a better chasiss than top 5 car makers. Sorry but customers don't buy chasiss, they buy cars.
However, I'll be most interested in knowing what kind of graphical interface system ReactOS has implemented. If it is functional enough and portable than I'll be ready take a stab at porting it to FreeBSD. But, at this point FreeBSD isn't ready (no framebuffer device??).
I think the lasting contribution of the ReactOS poroject might be a workable X11 alternative as a takeaway. If it works than it would have succeded in what Linux tried to do and failed i.e. open source desktop. API compatibility with Windows will also ensure porting of Windows apps fairly rapidly.