I would think it has sense to use tmux more under a tiling wm. I still do not understand your use of it.
Think of tmux more as job control on steroids. I.e spawning a new xterm for every shell is quite wasteful.
I would think it has sense to use tmux more under a tiling wm. I still do not understand your use of it.
Think of tmux more as job control on steroids. I.e spawning a new xterm for every shell is quite wasteful.
exec xterm -display :0.1 -e tmux new-session -s Session-Name03 -n Name-Windows \; split-window -v &
exec xterm tmux new-session -s Session-Name02 -n Windows-Name \; split-window -v \; selectp -t 0 \; split-window -h\; selectp -t 2 \; split-window -h\; selectp -t 3 \; split-window -h \; selectp -t 1 \; split-window -h &
exec alacritty -display :0.1 -e tmux new-session -s Session-Name01 -n Windows-name \; split-window -h \; new-window -n Windows-name2 \; split-window -h \; new-window -n Windows-name3 \; split-window -h &
set -g @plugin 'tmux-plugins/tmux-resurrect'
git clone https://github.com/tmux-plugins/tpm ~/.tmux/plugins/tpm
run '~/.tmux/plugins/tpm/tpm'
The reason I use tmux under X11 is because I can quickly swap between windows using C-> or C< rather than requiring to use the prefix key.And if he is using X11, then tmux makes also not much sense.
My tmux opens by default menus with C-B < and C-B >, these menus are a newer feature of tmux and runThe reason I use tmux under X11 is because I can quickly swap between windows using C-> or C< rather than requiring to use the prefix key.
I use emacs under X11 but still getting the hang of it. emacs and tmux are two things I wished I'd got familiar with when I started using FreeBSD.My tmux opens by default menus with C-B < and C-B >, these menus are a newer feature of tmux and run
normal tmux commands. The advantage of menus is, that you do not need to remember the commands or keys
associated to them, the disadvantage is that it is not so quickly as you say. Knowing keys is a big advantage also
in the console, I used emacs in (something like) a vt220 and use it today also under X11 in the same way, my
emacs is configured not to show menus or any other trash feature. Another advantage of tmux is the splitting of
windows as emacs and also nvi can do, more an advantage in the console.
For me is your wonderful use of tmux so an enigma as the use of the wonderful so called Desktop environments.
Just do the emacs tutorial ("C-h t" in emacs) and get used to e.m.a.c.s. (escape, meta, alt, control, shift) byusing it.I use emacs under X11 but still getting the hang of it. emacs and tmux are two things I wished I'd got familiar with when I started using FreeBSD.
I have no idea what you are talking about with this enigma business. I guess it's just sarcastic.
As a slightly niche case, I have used tmux to clean up / fix / normalise output on buggy terminals DtTerm, cmd.But you need some xterms always present before your eyes,
continuously 'multiplexing' to see some output has no sense.
Thats the point. One tmux server can provide you as many shells as you need.I never needed more than one tmux server.
Like its use in unreliable remote connections, but in this case, wayland crashes with all graphical programs running.Another niche case I can think of is the lack of resilience in basic consumer display systems like Wayland. If the window system / compositor crashes the whole session ends, killing all connected windows (i.e terminal emulators). So tmux will keep these sessions safe.
Just do the emacs tutorial ("C-h t" in emacs) and get used to e.m.a.c.s. (escape, meta, alt, control, shift) byusing it.
I do not understand what you wrote.I just wish I could get backspace working with invoking help (C-h). It's a real PITA being unable to use backspace, ie the key above ENTER which in every other application moves the cursor one space to the left and deletes the character under the cursor.
(normal-erase-is-backspace-mode 1)