I understand from where Paul Floyd's view point originates, what I don't undestand is pushing that narrative on an Unix forum.
The man specifically asked on how to work with C on a particular Unix system. You have basically shat on the entire codebase of the system whose forums' we're on, and the compiler used. You have needlessly introduced concepts of generic programming via C++ which has absolutely nothing to do with the Unix cpp standard lib, and you have introduced Rust as an even 'better' thing, and Rust brings their own entire runtime.
Imagine being on greasemonkey forum, somebody comes in asks what tools do I need to unscrew brakes on my '80s car, and someone goes ranting about how electric cars with modern braking systems are way safer and you should move to them immediately.
You are derailing the entire topic with your nonsense. If you believe C is unsafe what are you doing here?
The man specifically asked on how to work with C on a particular Unix system. You have basically shat on the entire codebase of the system whose forums' we're on, and the compiler used. You have needlessly introduced concepts of generic programming via C++ which has absolutely nothing to do with the Unix cpp standard lib, and you have introduced Rust as an even 'better' thing, and Rust brings their own entire runtime.
Imagine being on greasemonkey forum, somebody comes in asks what tools do I need to unscrew brakes on my '80s car, and someone goes ranting about how electric cars with modern braking systems are way safer and you should move to them immediately.
You are derailing the entire topic with your nonsense. If you believe C is unsafe what are you doing here?