- Thread Starter
- #26
Clear that given my own comment of FreeBSD, highlighting the benefits and security offered by the system, the answer of the experts in systems is the exhibited in the first comment, they say that FreeBSD stayed in the past and not evolved for graphical desktop environment by default. They know the history of FreeBSD, they refute me, saying that FreeBSD only focuses inI do not care how many they might be and who they are and what opinion they have, but stating "FreeBSD stayed in the past" is poorly informed.
But I do ask myself why you reference to that? How can it be, that you cannot make up your own mind and give those an appropriate answer?
In the first comment this one, that the derivatives of alone FreeBSD are projects, and one of them does not have for architecture for machines of 32 bits, they are insufficient.
Last edited by a moderator: