Hi all,
I have try to find info about this question but I did not get a clear response.
On some critical systems, sometimes a reboot is not an easy option so... can I upgrade between minor release versions (for example from 11.0 to 11.1) and don't get any risk about stability on system ?
Maybe the release solve a security problem on application side but don't give any interesting upgrade on kernel side to justify a reboot.
But Im not expert on freebsd and his internals. As I can read, all releases on the same freebsd version (9, 10, 11, etc) have always the same ABI so in theory there was no problem to only upgrade binary apps and not kernel. But why the need to do a freebsd-upgrade three times ?
I did an release upgrade (from 11.0 to 11.1) on a test server and it was ok, only that uname give old release version but this is not a problem.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks.
I have try to find info about this question but I did not get a clear response.
On some critical systems, sometimes a reboot is not an easy option so... can I upgrade between minor release versions (for example from 11.0 to 11.1) and don't get any risk about stability on system ?
Maybe the release solve a security problem on application side but don't give any interesting upgrade on kernel side to justify a reboot.
But Im not expert on freebsd and his internals. As I can read, all releases on the same freebsd version (9, 10, 11, etc) have always the same ABI so in theory there was no problem to only upgrade binary apps and not kernel. But why the need to do a freebsd-upgrade three times ?
I did an release upgrade (from 11.0 to 11.1) on a test server and it was ok, only that uname give old release version but this is not a problem.
Any thoughts ?
Thanks.