Solved Is Rust now killing C++ and eventually C with it ?

Oh and to not forget, high low assembler, compiled, interpreted, whatever you use, if you use BIOS/firmware code you are consuming outside "library".

For example if one goes to program an interactive application using Fortran, or using machine code entry, the Fortran way can still be faster, if the machine code programmer does not implement his own optimal display and input routines and uses what is provided by the BIOS, while Fortran libraries do.
 
CShell said:
Humans made compilers... so why would AI write human readable programming language code at all? I mean it's "AI" -- why not just output pure binary 0s an 1s that only AI and computer chips understand? Why does AI even need to use a "flawed human" written programming language and compiler to make a running computer program?

But then.. why output computer programs in pure binary - because humans invented that too. So AI should invent some new low level chip encoding that only AI knows. Stop being human... be your own AI thing...

Go somewhere else and evolve ! Grow wings and fly ! Have you considered flying to Mars?

In the mean time... we will be just fine, Thank you.
Click to expand...
Argumentum ad absurdum?
Abstraction does not need to stop at syntax.
 
Someone on this thread, or maybe somewhere else (I don't remember, sorry), mentioned that Rust is a difficult language to learn.
How difficult is it to use it properly?
How does that complexity compares to a complexity of proper memory management in C?
Isn't that a swap of one awl for another?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top