Those Filogic routers are awesome. Don't want to put together an raspberry pi it's a lot of hard work and boring. Why can't we have Mediatek Filogic support on BSD?
Those Filogic routers are awesome.
It's called marketingThere's a reason why Raspbrerry PI is so popular.
I agree with you. It would be awesome. Am dreaming to replace OpenWRT.Why can't we have Mediatek Filogic support on BSD?
It's called marketing
I mostly said about whole system. Did you try to install it?I don't even need the Wi-Fi to work just yet. I just want the CPU to work. Wi-Fi is doable by another AP.
You think installing FreeBSD on one of those devices would be plug and play? How do you expect "installing" FreeBSD on an embedded device would work?Don't want to put together an raspberry pi it's a lot of hard work and boring. Why can't we have Mediatek Filogic support on BSD?
The thing is Openwrt supports these. Mediatek Filogic all variants, even the older MT7921 series. These are all better than lame Pi's.I looked it up, and the Filogic 880 was the first search.
ARM Cortex A-73 CPU - should be doable
USXGMII 10G Ethernet - Would require the vendor to write drivers, or provide open source drivers that could be modified to work with FreeBSD. Being an AMD product, there may exist open source specifications or drivers that could be ported
Mediatek NPU for QoS, etc - would need special instructions written for FreeBSD to take advantage of, either by Mediatek, or if they have open sourced the specifications, someone with the knowledge and skill to write that into the FreeBSD code.
Wi-Fi 7 connectivity - Looks like some work is being done to support the Mediatek Wi-Fi chip, see:
![]()
Support the MediaTek Wireless cards · Issue #66 · FreeBSDFoundation/proj-laptop
User Story As a user, I want to use the MediaTek wireless card included in my Framework laptop so that I don't have to purchase a separate USB wireless adaptor. Implementation Notes The mt76 wirele...github.com
Even if all the specifications for the hardware were open to develop on, making an OS work with specific hardware is not trivial. As is the case with most hardware appliances, there would almost certainly need to be a commercial incentive to put in the required work to use this hardware with a FreeBSD-based router OS. Someone like Juniper for their proprietary OS, or if NetGate decided they wanted to offer pfSense boxes with this hardware.