zspider said:Yes he can and he can keep his frankenstein creations on his side of the fence.
Nifty post, @zspider. I'll save this quote with your permission. Truly, it was a big LOL :e
Last edited by a moderator:
zspider said:Yes he can and he can keep his frankenstein creations on his side of the fence.
cpm said:Good advocacy for a FreeBSD demand, @vanessa, but is a mystery today to know why developers are not enough interested to work in such DEs. The law of supply & demand doesn't work here as it's supposed that usually works. Seems that there are miles and miles of millions reasons to say "NO".
cpm said:I guess the developers have to approach to user's demand(s), but how do that? Well, be one of them is a good start
kpedersen said:Gnome 2 used to work quite well with FreeBSD around 7.x era. Then this stuff with dbus etc... caused it to go downhill.
A full desktop environment is so darn time consuming. I tried it with OpenCDE. However, if we only focus on FreeBSD and each do a couple of applications each, perhaps we can get something good in ports in about 6 months if all the developers who frequent this forum chip in?
cpm said:Nifty post, @zspider. I'll save this quote with your permission. Truly, it was a big LOL :e
TiberiusDuval said:GNOME3? Not having that available for FreeBSD is not a very great loss, in my opinion. I cannot say which one I loathe more, Windows 8's Modern UI or GNOME3, I have tested both, and came to conclusion that I will not either install Windows 8 or any Linux distro having GNOME3 as default DE.