I assumed nocona is the best to use but on this link below the test showed better results for core2 than nocona.
any idea why and does this mean core2 is a better choice on new gcc.
thanks
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/benchmarks/perlbench/
any idea why and does this mean core2 is a better choice on new gcc.
thanks
http://people.freebsd.org/~mm/benchmarks/perlbench/