D
Deleted member 65380
Guest
FreeBSD13, I changed pkg from quarterly to latest then had a package downgrade "expat: 2.4.3 -> 2.4.2"
Seems peculiar, anyone noticed this before?
Seems peculiar, anyone noticed this before?
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 436 Feb 10 22:23 /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf
pkg: Repository FreeBSD has a wrong packagesite, need to re-create database
because of the stupid "candidates" number:
pkg install -f ca_root_nss checkrestart expat libevent libnghttp2 pkg unbound
messages:Feb 10 22:33:11 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: expat downgraded: 2.4.3 -> 2.4.2
messages:Feb 10 22:33:12 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: libevent reinstalled: 2.1.12 -> 2.1.12
messages:Feb 10 22:33:12 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: libnghttp2 reinstalled: 1.46.0 -> 1.46.0
messages:Feb 10 22:33:17 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: pkg reinstalled: 1.17.5 -> 1.17.5
messages:Feb 10 22:33:18 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: ca_root_nss reinstalled: 3.74 -> 3.74
messages:Feb 10 22:33:18 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: checkrestart reinstalled: 0.5.0_1 -> 0.5.0_1
messages:Feb 10 22:33:20 freebsd-dns pkg[71119]: unbound reinstalled: 1.14.0 -> 1.14.0
pkg repo isn't rebuilt yet (which is pretty transparent from freshports).
(which is pretty transparent from freshports)
I recommend to use quarterly on aarch64 rather than latest.aarch64
This should only be a very short-term situation on any architecture. But a repo build date of 2022-01-26 for "latest" looks like there might be a problem right now...I recommend to use quarterly on aarch64 rather than latest.
There are a lot of packages in latest which are actually a lower version than in quarterly.
Since aarch64 is officially Tier 1, this is not acceptable.
I literally just wanted to try FreeBSD latest on something... wasn't expecting it to be messy. I don't literally need latest and can revert to quarterly easily enough.I recommend to use quarterly on aarch64 rather than latest.
Sure it does. The builders creating the different repos don't run "in sync". But normally, you'd expect something like that only for a very short term (at most a few days) and only after a new quarterly was branched off or there was some MFH.It literally does not make sense that it would go backwards in version.
No.I wonder if this has something to do with it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=260580
That's pretty much impossible, e.g. expat 2.4.2 (which is currently in that repo) hit the ports tree on 2021-12-27, so long after release of FreeBSD 13.It was built when 13.0-RELEASE came out and hasn't been updated since.
Be sure to use quarterly packages since latest are too old and won't work.
WTF? Why are latest older than quarterly?
ABI latest quarterly FreeBSD:13:aarch64 2020.10 2021.04