Other FreeBSD-1.0-RELEASE

I suppose this ISO is different somehow than the one on archive.freebsd.org ?

Which one, precisely?

After wallowing around amongst the many ways of slicing and dicing directories there, I found

http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/mirr...releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/FreeBSD-1.0-RELEASE/

which has in addition to the Walnut Creek 'cover.pnm', a 'cd1.iso' of the same size 661202944 as this one's 'FreeBSD-1.0-floppydisk.iso'

But without checksums or downloading both for diff, who can tell?
 
Which one, precisely?

After wallowing around amongst the many ways of slicing and dicing directories there, I found

http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/mirr...releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/FreeBSD-1.0-RELEASE/

which has in addition to the Walnut Creek 'cover.pnm', a 'cd1.iso' of the same size 661202944 as this one's 'FreeBSD-1.0-floppydisk.iso'

But without checksums or downloading both for diff, who can tell?
Interesting... I didn't take a close enough look to notice the cover. There is this directory as well which contains a single iso and no covers, so maybe this is the one I'm thinking of. The size for this one is listed as 661200896. The plot thickens.

http://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/1.0/
 
Hi,

If you wanna run FreeBSD 1.0 (1.0.2 to be precise), there is an interesting article by Tom Jones in the latest FreeBSD journal on this subject.

Great! I chose to download it, and thought the filename seemed vaguely familiar:

9a09afdf5fb325213a554aba948ae00a2e4bba06.2.pdf

Then found I already had it since 23rd June, when I'd renamed it to freebsd_journal_30y.pdf

(aside: I really don't get this trend of naming files for human use with long, impossible to recall hex strings)

He even provides a qemu image to run with a simple command :
[ which failed to quote? ]
and it works :) .

Cheers

Excellent!
 
Back
Top