Appreciate the honesty. However, this attitude presents a serious risk to the future of the OS, especially because it's open source. The first project that makes a true FreeBSD (not an OpenRC amalgam like GhostBSD) desktop distribution that works out of the box will effectively control the direction of the project in the long term, by the sheer eventual size of its userbase. This will occur regardless of whether the core FreeBSD dev team wants it to happen, whether next year or decades from now.
As an example, that's what occurred with Debian and Ubuntu. Ubuntu made things easier, people flocked to it, and now the long term direction of Linux as end users experience it is determined to a far greater extent on what Canonical and Red Hat (via systemd) do than what more "foundational" distributions with stronger philosophical principles like Debian do.
In other words, it may be better for the FreeBSD devs to support desktop users on their own terms than have another group of people dictate those terms to them down the road.