Other Cutefish Desktop for FreeBSD, we deserve it!

Hello everyone, I'm Brazilian so excuse my English.

From time to time I take a few days to test different operating systems and distributions. I've been wanting to give Arch Linux a try for a while now. Taking a look at the graphical interface repository, a name caught my attention: Cutefish Desktop. When I researched it, I discovered that it was a new desktop made to measure for a distribution (which was barely born and has since died) called CutefishOS.
( https://cutefish-ubuntu.github.io )

I installed it to try it out and I was surprised by the Desktop, they really did a good job. The interface was written in QT and doesn't seem to be based on anything else. Very similar to MacOS, I think it's the most similar I've ever used. Several aspects caught my attention:
- My notebook is quite old and the interface ran incredibly well.
- Suite of basic applications (calculator, file manager, control panel, text editor, music/video player, etc.) .
- There is practically nothing to configure, you can choose whether you want a light or dark theme, wallpaper, whether you want larger or smaller icons, position, wallpaper, whether you want window effects. Little distraction, it really helps a lot with focus, the file manager is very good.
- Very clean and cohesive, harmonious, coherent design. In order not to waste time and focus on productivity, it's been a while since I saw something so cool.


The Desktop project website on Git Hub is:
Source Code: ( https://github.com/cutefishos ).


SCREENSHOT
beautiful-designs .png


As I really liked the project, I tried to compile it on FreeBSD, but I had errors in Bluez and NetworkManager libraries.

After searching, I found the Wanted Ports page:
( https://wiki.freebsd.org/WantedPorts )

Where there was a link to a pre-compiled version for FreeBSD:
( https://github.com/flashmaster237/cutefish-freebsd )

I did the tests on a virtual machine, but without success, the Desktop didn't run. Honestly, I thought the project was very good, FreeBSD deserves this graphical environment, it can certainly bring different users closer to the system.


The author of pre-compiled version describes:

Some components are modified to strip NetworkManager and BlueZ code, the parts using these will be somewhat broken (Control Center, some tabs in the Settings app)



I tried to get in touch to request the modified sources and try to compile, but I never got a response. Here on the forum, isn't there a good algae that can fix the codes to try to run on FreeBSD? I don't have the programming knowledge to do this. Can anyone help? Embrace the project? It would be really cool!


Tanks!!!
 
The 2022 README mentions a port being developed by jsm (Jesper Schmitz Mouridsen).

helloSystem documentation includes an outdated link to a page in the FreeBSD wiki. The helloDesktop page leads to jsm222/helloDesktop on GitHub, last updated in 2021. There was a mention in the FreeBSD status report for the third quarter of the year.

HTH
 
Hello, thank you Cath O'Deray,I had seen those notes you mentioned, apparently it is stopped. I used these desktops as a test for some time, it's very simple, it runs really well, I would really like to be able to use it on FreeBSD. Let's wait for the next episodes.Hugs and thanks for responding.
 
I would love to, unfortunately I only program interpreted languages to automate routines.With work, I don't have time to dedicate myself to learning a language. But when I retire, it would be a good thing.
 
I just tested it, I mean CutefishOS (in a VM). I'm not impressed at all compared to Ubuntu and even compared to some DE in FreeBSD like XFCE, LXDE or LXQT, for the ones I know.

What it lacks is speed and smoothness. I understand this is in a development state, so it probably will improve.

Thanks for the link.
 
I never tried that WM before, but the landing page doesn't seem to be trusted. They said "Pay attention to design" and "Attention to detail", but the web page full of broken fonts and misaligned layout. Meh.

I personally don't understand such projects. It's another attempt to start from scratch to catch Apple's vibes, without deep thinking why. As many other similar projects, it seems like creators looses its initial drive.

1724936599255.png


And this is how they presented their "attention to details". Boo.
Guys, seriously… I'm not going to install it, sorry.

SCR-20240829-nkim.png
 
Back
Top