Because of my thoughts on Artificial --so called-- 'intelligence', I didn't further look at it. IMHO AI is overrated, but because it is over- or high rated its use will be spread by those who admire it.
Computers can process vast amounts of data and combinations, probably faster than humans can. In the same time computers can only do 'as instructed', and even when computers are able to make new instructions themselves these are based on instructions as given. Big question is if AI can come up with something _really_ new and unseen.
The ethical dimension is something we humans have to see develop, but we may be too late when some unethical AI-solution comes up and is already spread out all over the AI nerve system (remember the chatbots that became nazi within a matter of cycles). Besides the question who provided the ethical rules to AI for the first time? Todays view of the world will be different from tomorrows -- big question is whether humans and AI will shift narratives in a harmonious way.
AI-art IMHO is a major demonstration of human stupidity on what AI can do. Art, painting, sculpturing, writing, etc. is a profound human expression of being, and a far from rational process and experience. The joy of Art is both in creating as in seeing, reading and listening. In analogy, this is why there never will be self driving motorcycles -- it's just too much fun to ride it yourself! Even writing code to run a computer is a creative and fun process.
I can't think of any reason to automate that, deliberately stripping the human joy of life.
And scolars using AI, ChatGPT for writing their thesis don't understand the joy of learning and the joy of writing to develop yourself as a human being. Just passing the exam isn't enough, by far. For me.