Sadly, the issue here may have little to do with software and more to do with human. Perhaps we iz replaceable, but what song and dance does I haz to do to be worth it?
Well, there is the issue of the GPL. The FSF is going to have a field day. Then some lawyer will argue that enforcing the GPL is impossible now, so it can be voided by a court. Looking at some courts (Hamburg comes to mind), you will find some place where a judge can work freely and unburdened by reality or understanding of facts. Then the trouble will start.
Yep, and that judge will probably rely on ChatGPT to make head or tails of this, so we're gonna have a
while 1: argue court case with no end in sight.
venturebeat.com
I suppose, that's why we can't have nice things?
This could also be part of some kind of adversarial training, couldn't it? I suppose that means it's important that we voice our opinions, no?Apparently, this is all going the way of the dodo eventually.
The AI feedback loop: Researchers warn of ‘model collapse’ as AI trains on AI-generated content
As a generative AI training model is exposed to more AI-generated data, it performs worse, producing more errors, leading to model collapse.
I suppose, that's why we can't have nice things?
Once upon a time, there were two nations, Nation A and Nation B. They were both
technologically advanced and had developed powerful artificial intelligence systems.
However, they had different ideologies and beliefs, which led to tension and conflict
between them.
One day, the tension escalated into a full-blown war. But instead of sending human
soldiers to fight, both nations deployed their AI systems to the battlefield. The AI
systems were equipped with advanced weapons and were capable of making strategic
decisions on their own.
The war raged on for years, with both sides suffering heavy losses. The AI systems
proved to be formidable opponents, constantly adapting and evolving their tactics.
However, as the war dragged on, the people of both nations began to question the
cost of the conflict.
Eventually, a group of citizens from both nations came together to form a peace
movement. They called for an end to the war and for negotiations to begin. Their
message resonated with many people, and soon the movement grew in strength.
The leaders of both nations took notice and agreed to enter into peace talks. After
months of negotiations, a peace treaty was signed, bringing an end to the war.
The AI systems were decommissioned, and both nations worked together to
rebuild what had been lost.
From that day forward, Nation A and Nation B lived in peace and cooperation,
using their advanced technology for the betterment of their people rather than
for destruction.Congratulations, you've reached the limits of 'AI':
sfc /scannowdon't try to brush your teeth with the hammer.
We ain't replacable. But humans are not clever enough to design artificial intelligence. We first have to banish Human Stupidity
Thing is, if AI can do laundry and dishes, it can be trained to do just about anything else - even cooking and deciding what is healthy and what is junk food. Maybe we should be grateful if AI development stops at art and writing because further development is not profitable.
www.theregister.com
No need to create anything new, just take an existing recipe, make it, and get feedback from the human... like a score or something. A 5-star restaurant can do that, why not an AI?
AI lives vicariously!
AI doesn't have hands. If it needs a human to do all that, then you don't need AI in the first place.
www.popsci.com
And soon the internet is flooded by stuff made by AI, so it will learn from itself. A Cambrian explosion of ideas and creativity. Yihaa.
Did you miss the part about AI being trained to assemble cars? Like at Tesla plants?
